ENG New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Challenge: The Biggest Star in SpaceEngine
TalismanDate: Saturday, 21.07.2012, 00:43 | Message # 76
Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 409
Status: Offline
List updated! cool

Seems like the M1 0 stars are now dominating the list... Interesting...





 
apenpaapDate: Saturday, 21.07.2012, 01:37 | Message # 77
World Builder
Group: Users
Antarctica
Messages: 1063
Status: Offline
It seems to make sense, the hypergiant part. After all, that's what they're hypergiants for. I'd think the largest giants would be cooler, though... Maybe the M1 part is just a coincidence, or maybe a strangeness in SE.

EDIT: Also, I found another M1 0 XD literally the very first star I click on my next search for huge ones turns out to be good for a second place.



[Xsize=12]10.930 AU, M1 0 - apenpaap - 2nd place[/Xsize]
[Xcolor=yellow]RS 0-5-18139-302-3835-0-0-0 B (0.96)[/Xcolor]

Attachments: 3609384.jpg (219.5 Kb)





I occasionally stream at http://www.twitch.tv/magistermystax. Sometimes SE, sometimes other games.

Edited by apenpaap - Saturday, 21.07.2012, 01:43
 
anonymousgamerDate: Saturday, 21.07.2012, 01:58 | Message # 78
World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 1011
Status: Offline
Not my beloved 2nd place! Noooooo!




Desktop: FX-8350 4.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW 8 GB, 2 TB HDD, 24 inch 1920x1080 screen
Laptop: Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz (turbo 2.93), 8 GB DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6550m 1 GB, 640 GB HDD, 17.3 inch 1600x900 screen
 
JeppeDate: Saturday, 21.07.2012, 02:26 | Message # 79
Observer
Group: Newbies
Finland
Messages: 4
Status: Offline
I found another 11 AU star. surprised

11.104 AU, M1 0 - Jeppe - (1st)
RS 0-5-1252-2-17133-0-0-0 B (Version 0.96)

Attachments: 8273091.jpg (222.4 Kb)
 
SolarisDate: Saturday, 21.07.2012, 02:40 | Message # 80
World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
France
Messages: 731
Status: Offline
Niiice cool
 
AmwhereDate: Tuesday, 24.07.2012, 06:23 | Message # 81
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 62
Status: Offline
[Xsize=12]11.033AU, M1 0- Gifone - (2nd)[/Xsize]
[Xcolor=yellow]RS 0-0-0-1-30868-0-0-0 B (0.96.1)[/Xcolor]
 
TalismanDate: Tuesday, 24.07.2012, 17:50 | Message # 82
Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 409
Status: Offline
Well done Amwhere, but who is Gifone? Is that who found it? Or was it you?

List updated. cool





 
AmwhereDate: Tuesday, 24.07.2012, 19:52 | Message # 83
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 62
Status: Offline
It twas me - I though you meant to name it. smile
 
Sev00Date: Thursday, 26.07.2012, 16:16 | Message # 84
Space Tourist
Group: Users
France
Messages: 20
Status: Offline
Just went to visit it Amwhere, and it made me see something amazing I never saw before...
It's actually a binary system with a blue star and a hypergiant... It creates amazing lensflares effects and colors...
Its really blinding how powerfull these two stars are together when watching from that planet.

EDIT : just realized the SIZE of these ***** stars O___O
I did not realize it was counted in thousands of AU !
MY GOD...
Do such stars, Hypergiant, actually exist ?


Edited by Sev00 - Thursday, 26.07.2012, 16:20
 
TalismanDate: Thursday, 26.07.2012, 17:41 | Message # 85
Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 409
Status: Offline
Quote (Amwhere)
I though you meant to name it.


You only get to name a star after it's been the top star for 3 days. cool

And that reminds me. Jeppe, you can name your star now! PM me or post here.

Quote (Sev00)
I did not realize it was counted in thousands of AU


It is not counted in thousands of AU, that would be ridiculous! Even then, 10 AU is incredibly large, you see how large our own sun is, and the distance from the earth to the sun is 1 AU.

Theoretically, stars the size of 25 AU should be possible. Now that is what I call a large star.





 
apenpaapDate: Monday, 30.07.2012, 19:13 | Message # 86
World Builder
Group: Users
Antarctica
Messages: 1063
Status: Offline
Found one bigger than my old contender, though still a third place:
[Xsize=12]10.971 AU, M1 0 - apenpaap - (3rd)[/Xsize]
[Xcolor=yellow]RS 0-5-10930-187-14640-0-0-0 B (0.96.2)[/Xcolor]


Attachments: 5639026.jpg (410.3 Kb)





I occasionally stream at http://www.twitch.tv/magistermystax. Sometimes SE, sometimes other games.

Edited by apenpaap - Monday, 30.07.2012, 19:13
 
Sev00Date: Friday, 03.08.2012, 18:03 | Message # 87
Space Tourist
Group: Users
France
Messages: 20
Status: Offline
Quote (Talisman)
It is not counted in thousands of AU, that would be ridiculous! Even then, 10 AU is incredibly large, you see how large our own sun is, and the distance from the earth to the sun is 1 AU.

Theoretically, stars the size of 25 AU should be possible. Now that is what I call a large star.


Oh yeah, think I mistook it. Like "10.971 AU", here in France we would write it "10,971 AU". So I thought these were ten thousand AU... Which is completly ridiculous of course ^^
 
WASDWASDDate: Saturday, 01.12.2012, 19:58 | Message # 88
Observer
Group: Users
Portugal
Messages: 15
Status: Offline
Those stars are reeeeally big! And hard to find of course! wacko




Pentium® Dual Core CPU; E5700; 3.00 GHz; RAM: 4 GB; Windows 7 Home Premium

Sorry if my english is bad
 
werdnaforeverDate: Saturday, 29.12.2012, 00:28 | Message # 89
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 897
Status: Offline
11.015 AU, Red hypergiant - werdnaforever (3rd largest)
RS 0-2-60-58-21890-0-0-0 B (0.9.6.2)



What a pleasure it is to join the ranks of those who found 11AU stars.

Attachments: 1174863.jpg (501.3 Kb)


Edited by werdnaforever - Saturday, 29.12.2012, 04:18
 
smjjamesDate: Saturday, 29.12.2012, 06:05 | Message # 90
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 913
Status: Offline
I didn't think procedural hypergiants existed, at least I haven't seen any myself.

Maybe I oughta explore procedural galaxies more.







Edited by smjjames - Saturday, 29.12.2012, 06:08
 
Search: