ENG New site

Advanced search
[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Astrophotography
Fireinthehole-Date: Saturday, 13.09.2014, 17:53 | Message # 361
Pioneer
Group: Translators
Sweden
Messages: 365
Status: Offline
Watsisname, extraordinary pictures smile




Love Space Engine!
 
WatsisnameDate: Monday, 15.09.2014, 14:45 | Message # 362
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Thanks guys, though I maintain I've got nothing compared to Antza's work. smile

One more for M31.





 
midtskogenDate: Monday, 15.09.2014, 20:45 | Message # 363
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Nice ones, Wats! The technical details?




NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
 
WatsisnameDate: Tuesday, 16.09.2014, 15:59 | Message # 364
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Sure thing:
Canon EOS Rebel T3 @ 18mm (EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II lens)
20s @ f/3.5, ISO1600
Tungsten white balance (raised to 4200K; incandescent might have been better)
RAW format with post editing in Gimp/UFRaw.

The first two were taken at Mount Baker, where the sky is pretty dark (limiting magnitude 6.6-7.0) though the rising gibbous moon degraded sky quality a bit. Reasonable trade-off for illuminating the volcano in the second shot. smile The third was taken on my deck (limiting magnitude 5.5-6.0), with no moonlight.

I've got the Rokinon 16M-C 16mm f/2.0 lens on my Christmas list, can't wait to see how that performs in comparison to the zoom.





 
midtskogenDate: Friday, 19.09.2014, 08:13 | Message # 365
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
I have almost no zoom lenses because of the speed loss, but zoom lenses aren't such a show stopper for low light photography as they used to be (back in the analogue days).

Added (19.09.2014, 07:13)
---------------------------------------------


Looks like a meteor, but it partly travels in front of terrain and it only appears in one frame of a video. So most likely it's a cosmic ray artifact. The biggest one that I've seen, though. Close up:






NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI


Edited by midtskogen - Friday, 19.09.2014, 08:15
 
Stargate38Date: Friday, 19.09.2014, 19:57 | Message # 366
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 58
Status: Offline
That's definitely NOT a meteor! If it was, it would go behind the terrain. I think a single cosmic ray sneaking through Earths magnetic field is definately possible, especially since you live closer to the north pole where they (along with solar wind) play a part in the formation of the Aurora Borealis.

Also, What are those black boxes? Are there vehicles there that you (or your neighbors) didn't want to be shown online?
 
WatsisnameDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 00:05 | Message # 367
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
I thought cosmic ray strikes usually appeared as specks. They sometimes appear linear? Seems like it would take a very improbable intersection angle on the sensor.




 
WatsisnameDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 11:52 | Message # 368
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Close-up of the Andromeda Galaxy with just the DSLR and tripod (no tracking mount). Even got M32 and M110!









 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 12:15 | Message # 369
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote Watsisname ()
Close-up of the Andromeda Galaxy with just the DSLR and tripod

Great job! But I am jealous of your sky. This is what it looks like where I live under the best circumstances (single exposure). M 110 is barely visible.




Keep the photos coming Wats!





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
FastFourierTransformDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 12:17 | Message # 370
Pioneer
Group: Local Moderators
Spain
Messages: 542
Status: Offline
Amazing!!!
Only with a camera. Galileo would be soooo proud
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 12:44 | Message # 371
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote FastFourierTransform ()
Galileo would be soooo proud

My camera with a 300mm lens is almost exactly as capable as Galileo's telescope was (low-light and wide-field abilities aside). When I take pictures of the Moon, or Jupiter, or Saturn, I see almost exactly the things that Galileo saw; in fact his sketches and descriptions match my images almost perfectly. I feel a personal connection to history when I capture and view those images, it's a wonderful thing.





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
WatsisnameDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 21:38 | Message # 372
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Quote HarbingerDawn ()
This is what it looks like where I live under the best circumstances (single exposure). M 110 is barely visible.


That actually looks extremely similar to my raw frames. Here's one with no editing, just luminance desaturation and rotated to be in same angle:



I bet you could get really good results with RAW & stacking, even with the light pollution. smile





 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 20.09.2014, 22:32 | Message # 373
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Wow yeah, yours is only very slightly darker. I'll have to go out sometime and see what I can do smile




All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
midtskogenDate: Sunday, 21.09.2014, 12:58 | Message # 374
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Quote Stargate38 ()
Also, What are those black boxes? Are there vehicles there that you (or your neighbors) didn't want to be shown online?

Yes, I figured that some might not be too happy about having their windows or front doors online and recorded, so I added those.

Quote Watsisname ()
I thought cosmic ray strikes usually appeared as specks. They sometimes appear linear? Seems like it would take a very improbable intersection angle on the sensor.

Apparently, but I find it surprising myself, in particular such a long line. I'm not sure what the physical explanation is. But I have no other explanation, unless someone in my neighbourhood is firing with tracer ammo.

If you search for cosmic ray artifact Google will give you similar pictures.





NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
 
WatsisnameDate: Sunday, 21.09.2014, 22:30 | Message # 375
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
I think cosmic ray (or muon decay product of one) is by far the most likely explanation, it's just that as you say the extreme track length is surprising. It makes a lot more sense now after realizing the sensor is oriented roughly vertically, unlike in most terrestrial-based CCD astronomy. Then you expect fewer events, but longer tracks on average, with ones as long as that rare, but inevitable given enough time.




 
Search: