ENG New site

Advanced search
[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Known issues and bug reports - SpaceEngine 0.97
HarbingerDawnDate: Wednesday, 01.05.2013, 06:26 | Message # 1
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Please post here all of your reports about bugs or crashes in SpaceEngine. Before you post any bugs, please follow these steps:

  • Read the Troubleshooting for SpaceEngine 0.97. It is possible that your problem can be solved there.

  • Make sure that your bugs are not on the following list of known issues. You can use your browser's word finder to help search the list.

  • If the bug is not on the list then please post it in this thread. Attach to your message a screenshot (if possible) and a log file (it's called the "se.log" and is located in the system folder of SpaceEngine's directory). Only the log file will help me to understand your problem and find a solution.



    Known Issues



    Edited by HarbingerDawn - Monday, 30.09.2013, 22:45
  •  
    SpaceEngineerDate: Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 09:22 | Message # 151
    Author of Space Engine
    Group: Administrators
    Russian Federation
    Messages: 4800
    Status: Offline
    Quote (smjjames)
    When I had gone to what might have been the closest (2,800 parsec from core), I was having the heavy lagspike as usual and was trying to ride it out as it just sort of spontaneously goes away, so I was looking around trying to find a good triple star system when SE crashed from the lag. However, when I started SE back up, the FPS was fine.

    Again, did you use the Star browser before? Low FPS probably caused by 20 planetary systems, rendered at once.

    Quote (smjjames)
    I did some testing by clearing out the cache to see what would happen, the star I have in the example changed, then I went to a distant cluster, restarted and the star system had changed again

    This is a seed changing bug. First time you visit that star, it being generated with wrong seed in some reason. When you restart SE, the seed for that star becomes right.





     
    smjjamesDate: Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 16:10 | Message # 152
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    Quote (SpaceEngineer)
    Quote (smjjames)
    When I had gone to what might have been the closest (2,800 parsec from core), I was having the heavy lagspike as usual and was trying to ride it out as it just sort of spontaneously goes away, so I was looking around trying to find a good triple star system when SE crashed from the lag. However, when I started SE back up, the FPS was fine.

    Again, did you use the Star browser before? Low FPS probably caused by 20 planetary systems, rendered at once.


    Nope, hadn't even used the star browser in that galaxy. I did suspect it was caused by loading stars in dense clusters since it went away after a while, however, I was also getting those memory errors in the log, which is mainly why I decided to post it before I discovered this other problem.

    Quote (SpaceEngineer)
    Quote (smjjames)
    I did some testing by clearing out the cache to see what would happen, the star I have in the example changed, then I went to a distant cluster, restarted and the star system had changed again

    This is a seed changing bug. First time you visit that star, it being generated with wrong seed in some reason. When you restart SE, the seed for that star becomes right.


    Strange, It changed multiple times for two stars before it settled (and one of them I didn't actually visit again) and it seems to only affect stars in clusters (haven't looked into globular clusters). I actually had the same problem in a different galaxy, so it's not just one galaxy.

    I hope that gets fixed because it's annoying when trying to find a system that I like only to have it dissapear if I crash or close the program or simply come back to find it not there.

    That transparent rimmed crater that I posted earlier was strange as well and could have been related to the seed changing bug. If I run into that again (assuming it doesn't vanish due to seed changing bug), I'll definetly post it.







    Edited by smjjames - Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 16:12
     
    HmudaDate: Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 21:41 | Message # 153
    Observer
    Group: Users
    Hungary
    Messages: 16
    Status: Offline
    Anyone have any idea what could be causing this and how to fix it?

     
    smjjamesDate: Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 22:04 | Message # 154
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    Restarting usually clears it for me, sometimes changing the angle might work

    As for what causes it, I don't know the specifics of it and all I really know is that it's a graphical glitch with the skybox that has been around for a long time. Also, you could have posted this in the troubleshooting thread rather than make a new one.







    Edited by smjjames - Tuesday, 04.06.2013, 22:05
     
    HarbingerDawnDate: Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 02:53 | Message # 155
    Cosmic Curator
    Group: Administrators
    United States
    Messages: 8717
    Status: Offline
    Hmuda, seams in the skybox on bright parts of the galaxy is a long-known issue, and there's no way to fix it at present. If it bothers you then you can toggle skyboxes on and off in the graphics menu (via the sidebar buttons or Ctrl-F4).

    Also you should have posted this in the bug reports thread.

    Quote (smjjames)
    changing the angle might work

    Changing the camera angle will have no effect as the skybox is only regenerated after moving a large distance.

    Quote (smjjames)
    you could have posted this in the troubleshooting thread

    Bug reports, not troubleshooting.





    All forum users, please read this!
    My SE mods and addons
    Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
     
    anonymousgamerDate: Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 03:53 | Message # 156
    World Builder
    Group: Global Moderators
    United States
    Messages: 1011
    Status: Offline
    The clouds on this world are out of the atmosphere.

    From a distance



    Juuuust underneath the cloud layer



    Juuuust above the cloud layer


    Attachments: 9953078.jpg (221.4 Kb) · 4375169.jpg (214.8 Kb) · 4352869.jpg (204.1 Kb)





    Desktop: FX-8350 4.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW 8 GB, 2 TB HDD, 24 inch 1920x1080 screen
    Laptop: Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz (turbo 2.93), 8 GB DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6550m 1 GB, 640 GB HDD, 17.3 inch 1600x900 screen
     
    smjjamesDate: Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 05:35 | Message # 157
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    Quote (HarbingerDawn)
    Quote (smjjames)
    changing the angle might work

    Changing the camera angle will have no effect as the skybox is only regenerated after moving a large distance.


    I thought I had fixed it once by doing that, maybe not. Changing the camera angle and/or position to hide it or put it offscreen is still an option.





     
    smjjamesDate: Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 20:47 | Message # 158
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    I've run into two graphics errors in the same system which seem to be different types, the other planets in the system are unaffected. I didn't see any errors in the SE log, but I've included it to provide graphics related information.

    The first one resembles the shimmering that happens with an eclipse, but I checked and it's not an eclipse. and if you turn the atmosphere off, the effect goes away. Although if you turn the atmosphere off and pan the camera around slightly while looking at the same spot, you can see little flashes of light. Also turned comet tails off and both glitches still persist.



    This one I don't think I've seen before and unlike the previous, it shows up with atmosphere off. This is the second planet of the binary pair at the location.



    It's a globular cluster btw, so I know it didn't dissapear on me.

    Place "atmospheric shimmer bug"
    {
    Body "RSC 0-7-1860209-74-2573-0-0-158 3"
    Parent "RSC 0-7-1860209-74-2573-0-0-158 3-3.1"
    Pos (7.205026805756111e-010, -3.95583722842454e-010, -6.513736170452381e-011)
    Rot (0.550584847566603, -0.08955572355498177, 0.729026306196614, -0.3966821685958737)
    Date "2013.06.05 19:11:17.83"
    Vel 8.5010679e-011
    Mode 1
    }

    Attachments: 5375472.log (19.0 Kb) · 6661076.jpg (330.6 Kb) · 5927389.jpg (368.6 Kb)







    Edited by smjjames - Thursday, 06.06.2013, 19:26
     
    osterizer8Date: Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 21:57 | Message # 159
    Space Tourist
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 33
    Status: Offline
    I have a problem with galaxies. Some galaxies (both catalog and procedural) render, but a huge number of both types do not. it is impossible to select them with the mouse or see them. The search function will lead you to where they are supposed to be, but there is nothing there- not even stars.





    The galaxies shown are Andromeda and the Milky Way.

    Attachments: 5167501.log (37.9 Kb) · 3721586.jpg (114.9 Kb) · 1180386.jpg (32.6 Kb)


    Edited by osterizer8 - Wednesday, 05.06.2013, 21:58
     
    SpaceEngineerDate: Thursday, 06.06.2013, 11:46 | Message # 160
    Author of Space Engine
    Group: Administrators
    Russian Federation
    Messages: 4800
    Status: Offline
    Quote (osterizer8)
    The search function will lead you to where they are supposed to be, but there is nothing there- not even stars.

    Which galaxies exactly did not render?





     
    VoekoevakaDate: Thursday, 06.06.2013, 12:32 | Message # 161
    World Builder
    Group: SE team
    France
    Messages: 1016
    Status: Offline
    Quote (anonymousgamer)
    The clouds on this world are out of the atmosphere.

    Yes, I notice that clouds are sometimes too high on 0.97.

    Wow, I was playing with Star Wars ships and I saw this in the sky :



    Then I noticed the screenshot havn't worked, so I can only describe what I saw : a white streal in the sky. It seemed to be big.

    Other bug I saw, I was going to Jupiter with the Discovery One ship, then one side of Jupiter was suddenly covered by the texture of the keyboard of the computer of the ship.

    Attachments: 9744516.jpg (15.7 Kb) · 1490086.log (32.4 Kb)





    Want some music of mine ? Please go here !



    Edited by Voekoevaka - Thursday, 06.06.2013, 15:46
     
    smjjamesDate: Thursday, 06.06.2013, 23:41 | Message # 162
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    When I saw this, I checked several oceanias, including one that just happened to be slightly bigger in diameter (was much more massive though), and this 3D water problem seems to be only happening with this particular planet.

    As you approach, it looks opaque as it should, but around 65k km out, it starts transitioning to transparent and somewhere between 50k and 45k out, it starts transitioning to the near surface opaquity. It's like the transition isn't overlapping correctly with this one

    Edit: Spotted another one that is somewhat larger and has the same problem. Anybody remember whether this bug happened in 0.96? I don't remember if it did or not.



    Place "3D water problem"
    {
    Body "RS 0-6-117028-1097-896-7-739585-4 A4"
    Parent "RS 0-6-117028-1097-896-7-739585-4 A4-A4.1"
    Pos (3.43086601825842e-010, 1.489883642348013e-009, -1.465604871622381e-009)
    Rot (-0.2340996600167925, 0.7003610192927421, 0.596238453743853, 0.3149468179112039)
    Date "2013.06.06 22:21:06.63"
    Vel 3.2407764e-011
    Mode 1
    }

    Attachments: 7880462.jpg (119.3 Kb)







    Edited by smjjames - Thursday, 06.06.2013, 23:48
     
    osterizer8Date: Thursday, 06.06.2013, 23:41 | Message # 163
    Space Tourist
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 33
    Status: Offline
    I'm not sure what happened, but galaxies are starting to render if I use the "go to" function. The galaxies don't render form a distance (so you can't see many galaxies when you are in intergalactic space) but when I "go to" them they show up. I can't tell you which ones didn't render form a distance because there are so many. The Milky Way, Andromeda, and Triangulum render, but that may be because they are close enough to make out clearly from the Milky Way. I can find an occasional group of random galaxies that render and I have noticed that you can see NGC 23 from NGC 1, but you can still kind of make out NGC 23's shape from NGC 1. I'm not sure if that is why it shows up, however.


    NGC 1. NGC 23 is the only other galaxy visible in this shot.

    Attachments: 8902651.jpg (25.5 Kb) · 8974594.log (22.6 Kb)
     
    smjjamesDate: Thursday, 06.06.2013, 23:56 | Message # 164
    World Builder
    Group: Users
    United States
    Messages: 913
    Status: Offline
    osterizer8, Do you have auto increase galaxy magnitude on? Because when I turn it off, I can replicate the screenshot, with auto-magnitude on, I can see the shape of NGC 26 in the distance

    Sounds like you simply have the auto magnitude off here.







    Edited by smjjames - Thursday, 06.06.2013, 23:57
     
    HarbingerDawnDate: Friday, 07.06.2013, 05:20 | Message # 165
    Cosmic Curator
    Group: Administrators
    United States
    Messages: 8717
    Status: Offline
    Quote (smjjames)
    As you approach, it looks opaque as it should, but around 65k km out, it starts transitioning to transparent and somewhere between 50k and 45k out, it starts transitioning to the near surface opaquity.

    This happens with every oceania or very nearly and has been happening forever.





    All forum users, please read this!
    My SE mods and addons
    Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
     
    Search: