ENG New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Conspiracy Theories
spacerDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 15:56 | Message # 616
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
and elon musk must be a good helping alien from the "alien human saving fundation ressistence"




"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
JackDoleDate: Friday, 22.07.2016, 17:04 | Message # 617
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1742
Status: Offline
Quote spacer ()
"alien human saving fundation ressistence"

Such an organization would be very likely illegal.

The aliens have probably something like an 'Prime Directive', and they stay out of the affairs of primitive peoples.

It can be only evil aliens who do business with people of Earth. Like arms dealers who sell weapons to crisis areas. Thus, people can kill each other.
What the evil aliens of course would quite right.





Don't forget to look here.

 
spacerDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 15:51 | Message # 618
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
spacex rocket exploded today with israeli Satellite on it 2 days before launch.
spacex officials says the blast was cause by anomaly!

let the spoculation begins!! is that was intention to harm spacex? the satellite? inside job?
maybe the satellite was a trap?
(no hate to anyone)
biggrin crazy tongue





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 15:56 | Message # 619
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Probably just a failure or something, nothing special.
 
spacerDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 16:09 | Message # 620
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
ppl always love to think about conspiracies! who knows! biggrin




"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer


Edited by spacer - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 16:39
 
HornblowerDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:28 | Message # 621
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
Here's some speculation for you:
The SpaceX rocket was deliberately demolished on the launchpad to create jobs for Americans. These jobs would be repairing the launch pad and building the replacement payload.
That, or it's those darn lizard people who live on the moon again. I've heard they recently moved to HD 164595.


Edited by Hornblower - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:34
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:35 | Message # 622
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
I don't like how people make up jokes about theories which May make sense.

Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:35
 
spacerDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:45 | Message # 623
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
steeljaw354, ohh it probably was problem in the launch pad or oxygen tanks
i know.





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 20:53 | Message # 624
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
If you want to make an argument against a certain theory, you must study that theory you are against in depth instead of doing no research at all. Also show proof of your research when you present arguments against a certain theory.

Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 21:05
 
n0b0dyDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 21:10 | Message # 625
Explorer
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 297
Status: Offline
I don't know - I am puzzled: In 2003, Columbia was destroyed during re-entry. An Israeli astronaut was on board that mission. Now a rocket carrying an Israeli payload exploded on the pad... Most likely a bad coincidence but still...
 
spacerDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 21:22 | Message # 626
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
Quote steeljaw354 ()
you must study that theory you are against

conspiracies theories are not always disprove others theory.
its theories about some mysterious case we dont know the cause for it and we think about ideas of what happend
that is not the normal way we may thing it is. like kennedy assassination. i wont disprove it wasnt just a shooter. but i will also think about other "unormal" ideas like aliens, bullet change diraction in mid air, the mafia. etc.
that you cant also disporve them





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer


Edited by spacer - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 21:23
 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 21:34 | Message # 627
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Theres just so much of them, at least a few of them have to be right.
 
WatsisnameDate: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 22:30 | Message # 628
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Across different cultures there are many creation stories about how the cosmos, Earth and humans were made. Having a big number of ideas doesn't automatically mean any of them have to be right. smile The way to know if something is right is by testing it carefully, if it can be tested.




 
steeljaw354Date: Thursday, 01.09.2016, 22:56 | Message # 629
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
Creation stories and such are besides the point, they are not conspiracy theories which isn't the topic of the thread anyways. Solipsism is the way I go on that sort of stuff. The way to know if something is right is by testing it carefully Yourself

Edited by steeljaw354 - Thursday, 01.09.2016, 23:00
 
WatsisnameDate: Friday, 02.09.2016, 01:09 | Message # 630
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
It is not besides the point, it is the point. This is a logic check. smile If having a large number of creation myths does not guarantee at least one of them is right, then why does having a large number of conspiracy theories guarantee at least one of them is right?

This isn't like blindly shooting arrows at a target, saying that if you shoot enough arrows you expect to eventually score a hit. This is like blindly shooting arrows without being sure that the target is even there. You can't know that it is there or whether you hit or missed unless you check. That is the power of hypothesis testing in the scientific method: we fire some arrows and check if they hit, and make adjustments as necessary.





 
Search: