ENG New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Totally off-topic thread
WatsisnameDate: Saturday, 12.11.2016, 22:55 | Message # 3376
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Nice algebra challenge. The answers (plural) are indeed quite simple.



Quote Hornblower ()
P.S. Watsisname, what do you use for your equations


LaTeX, output as an image with alpha channel, and then invert the color.





 
HornblowerDate: Saturday, 12.11.2016, 23:15 | Message # 3377
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
Watsisname, Nice work! The way I came across this problem was while I was sitting in math and I was thinking about a complicated equation (sin(x)/cos(y)=blah blah blah) and I was thinking to move side of the equation to the other, you could either subtract from both or divide from both. So I thought about how this would work in a more simple problem (x=y) and I got these two possible outcomes:



or



And then since they're both equal to 0, I set them equal to each other and tried to get from that to y=x again!

Attachments: 9207202.png (0.8 Kb) · 6123637.png (0.7 Kb)


Edited by Hornblower - Saturday, 12.11.2016, 23:17
 
WatsisnameDate: Saturday, 12.11.2016, 23:44 | Message # 3378
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
That's great! It can be a very useful strategy for problem solving, to take the problem and relate it or simplifying it down to a different problem that you are more comfortable with. If fractions involving trig functions are hard to think about, then break it down to relations of x and y. smile

I think it's also good to start every problem by first thinking "what kind of problem is it?" If we don't understand what kind of problem we're trying to solve, it's generally hard to know how to begin besides shots in the dark. In my case, my first recognition was "this looks like a quadratic, and I know how to solve those." Of course, the fact that it is quadratic might not be obvious. There's a term with y in it, and a term with something divided by y in it. That's y to the 1st power, and y to the -1 power. Which means the equation is of the form:

ay1+by0+cy-1=0

This is equivalent to a quadratic, since multiplication by y turns it into

ay2+by1+cy0=0





 
HornblowerDate: Sunday, 13.11.2016, 03:11 | Message # 3379
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
♪Here comes the sun! Do-do-do-doo!♫



Attachments: 9000787.jpg (273.6 Kb) · 2580984.jpg (327.5 Kb)
 
BananaDate: Sunday, 13.11.2016, 23:49 | Message # 3380
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 56
Status: Offline
"Houston, we have a problem. The Sun's coming our way, and it looks angry!"

"Quick! Start singing!"





Hello.
 
WatsisnameDate: Sunday, 13.11.2016, 23:52 | Message # 3381
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
I just wanted a warm bath was all...




 
spacerDate: Monday, 14.11.2016, 15:51 | Message # 3382
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
wow!! the moon looks awesome
north americans!! go out tonight to watch it. you wont regret it.
but not extreme big like the news wanted it to be heard....
they just get people too hyped
take images of it too.
too bad i only have sucks iphone camera





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer


Edited by spacer - Monday, 14.11.2016, 15:55
 
WatsisnameDate: Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 02:42 | Message # 3383
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Too cloudy to see it here, though it looked pretty big and bright in the sky last night. As for hype, it's still pretty much the same as every other 'supermoon', which isn't that much more impressive than an average full moon or even a micromoon. The media loves to hype these things because hype sells and most people don't know how much the Moon's apparent size changes along its elliptical orbit.

It can be a fun exercise to show it -- how much does its appearance change exactly. With trig, you can show its angular size (in degrees) to be:



Plug in the distance of the moon at its closest and its furthest: 356,400km and 406,700km respectively.

Then the apparent sizes are:
0.5587° and 0.4896°,
or a change of about 14.1% from smallest to largest. Which is barely noticeable. But it makes a difference in photographs, and whether or not the Moon completely covers the Sun's disk in an eclipse. smile





 
WatsisnameDate: Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 06:03 | Message # 3384
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Just watched the first episode of the MARS series on Nat Geo. It was pretty good! It did leave me with one question though...

Why would you choose your base camp / landing site to be in Valles Marineris? tongue





 
spacerDate: Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 10:44 | Message # 3385
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
Watsisname, gonna watch it today!
edit:
watched it now,
but why does the skies of mars in the show is so white and bright?
also it looks like they forgot about gravity...all seems to walk pretty much like on earth and even the sand fall like on earth





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer


Edited by spacer - Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 11:48
 
HornblowerDate: Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 21:04 | Message # 3386
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
I was bored, so I combined some images from Curiosity's NAVCAM to create 3D pictures [cross your eyes to view(sorry people who can't cross their eyes)]
First three are from yesterday. Last one is from Murray Buttes.
Click to enlarge





____________________________________________________________________________________
Addition: Soon I'll make some color ones Turns out it's really hard to find good color images!

Attachments: 6418375.jpg (582.3 Kb) · 4755000.jpg (584.8 Kb) · 7832458.jpg (535.3 Kb) · 3476249.jpg (571.8 Kb)


Edited by Hornblower - Tuesday, 15.11.2016, 21:20
 
WatsisnameDate: Wednesday, 16.11.2016, 00:22 | Message # 3387
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Hornblower, I like those! They really emphasize the vast distances, which are otherwise not obvious in a single image.




 
HornblowerDate: Wednesday, 16.11.2016, 00:38 | Message # 3388
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
Watsisname, here's one of my favorite of my next few that I've done

Attachments: 4327389.jpg (563.3 Kb)
 
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Wednesday, 16.11.2016, 00:44 | Message # 3389
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
I will have to try to convert some of those 3D images to work with my Vive, it would probably be easier on the eyes than going cross eyed.




Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
HornblowerDate: Wednesday, 16.11.2016, 01:09 | Message # 3390
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
DoctorOfSpace, for the vive, you will have to switch which side they're on. (Although I assume you already know this)
 
Search: