ENG New site

Advanced search
[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Totally off-topic thread
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Tuesday, 17.09.2013, 08:10 | Message # 1726
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
They should hire me to write the stories.






Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
apenpaapDate: Tuesday, 17.09.2013, 08:21 | Message # 1727
World Builder
Group: Users
Antarctica
Messages: 1063
Status: Offline





I occasionally stream at http://www.twitch.tv/magistermystax. Sometimes SE, sometimes other games.
 
werdnaforeverDate: Wednesday, 18.09.2013, 03:45 | Message # 1728
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 897
Status: Offline
Quote (midtskogen)
breaking the "First Directive"

Prime directive
 
midtskogenDate: Wednesday, 18.09.2013, 07:09 | Message # 1729
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Quote (werdnaforever)
Prime directive

Close enough. smile

It seems to be a pattern when a full length movie is made of a TV series, the movie plot is more poorly written than the plot of an average TV episode. Perhaps it's a consequence of too much money being thrown at the movie. Low budget forces a better plot to compensate for the lack of money for visual effects.

Totally unrelated: One of my weather stations reported 8 mm rainfall (nearly a third of an inch for the unit impaired) in 5 minutes yesterday. Such intensities are rare in Norway.





NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI


Edited by midtskogen - Wednesday, 18.09.2013, 07:12
 
WatsisnameDate: Wednesday, 18.09.2013, 18:46 | Message # 1730
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Quote
Of the million ways this could plausibly happen, the story has a cold fusion bomb capable of instantly freezing all magma inside a massive volcano.


The new Star Trek films are insanely awful in the science department. Don't even get me started on the black hole physics from the first one... hngggg!

I did think they were both very entertaining films, but only as long as I could manage to continually divert power from the thinking part of my brain to the WHEEE EYECANDY part. :S





 
midtskogenDate: Wednesday, 18.09.2013, 19:41 | Message # 1731
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Quote (Watsisname)
I did think they were both very entertaining films, but only as long as I could manage to continually divert power from the thinking part of my brain to the WHEEE EYECANDY part. :S

The airing of History Channel's "Vikings" began yesterday over here. I had a look. I wish I was better at switching off the necessary parts of the brain. Apparently all of Scandinavia (including Denmark whose highest "peak" today is 171 masl) consisted of deep fjords 1200 years ago. Ok, scenery, clothing, relationships of historical persons are always rewritten and mixed freely. But why couldn't the rest be moderately believable? The rest was to me simply a continuous "no, they wouldn't say that, do that or think that". Argh.





NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
 
werdnaforeverDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 04:12 | Message # 1732
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 897
Status: Offline
Quote (Watsisname)
The new Star Trek films are insanely awful in the science department. Don't even get me started on the black hole physics from the first one... hngggg!

You can say that again. Don't forget about cold fusion devices! And the enterprise doesn't warp anymore. It jumps, or something... and just what is that trail it leaves behind in Into Darkness? Are they ice crystals?

They've turned Star Trek into Star Wars. I'm not saying Star Wars is bad, but SW and ST are two different things. If anyone needs more proof, when the Enterprise goes into warp it looks just like in Star Wars as they fly through hyperspace. Also, I thought that blowing up Vulcan in 2009 was symbolic for what they did to ST. They quickly eliminated all the logic and reason.

And what's with this "destiny" BS? First there was all that stuff in 2009 about their destinies being altered. I said OK, fine, it's a time travel move. But then in Into Darkness Capt. Pike says to Kirk how "he altered the destiny of Nibiru". And later Spock "prime" says that he made a vow to never give them information that could potentially alter their destiny. Who's writing this stuff?

Ok I'm done.
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 04:13 | Message # 1733
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote (werdnaforever)
They've turned Star Trek into Star Wars

No they haven't. JJ Trek is not comparable to Star Wars in any meaningful sense.





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
WatsisnameDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 05:33 | Message # 1734
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Quote (werdnaforever)
and just what is that trail it leaves behind in Into Darkness? Are they ice crystals?







 
werdnaforeverDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 05:34 | Message # 1735
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 897
Status: Offline
Quote (HarbingerDawn)
No they haven't. JJ Trek is not comparable to Star Wars in any meaningful sense.

Not literally... but they've turned it away from it's roots and into that direction... the action packed science fantasy genre. They've thrown all the science out the airlock and into space! Its all about the "characters" now. :P

EDIT:
Quote (Watsisname)




I can't see anything. Did you not type anything or is it just my PC acting funny? Or did you post a youtube video?


Edited by werdnaforever - Thursday, 19.09.2013, 05:45
 
WatsisnameDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 07:03 | Message # 1736
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
It's a picture of a carton of Ice Breaker mints. Because by extremely rigorous scientific analysis of the particles and associated sound effects in vacuum, I determined the Enterprise's warp drive in Into Darkness is powered by coolmint flavor crystals.

y'know, 'cause they're cool. And taste great with Big Red Matter Cinnamon balls.

...I'll just go to bed now. :V





 
HarbingerDawnDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 07:04 | Message # 1737
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote (werdnaforever)
They've thrown all the science out the airlock and into space!

In all fairness, Star Trek has always been extremely loose with its science and has been known to break its own rules a time or ten. It was never about science with Trek, it was about a vision of the future, a reflection on the issues we face in our society today that also provided hope for tomorrow. And Star Wars is not about action, it's about storytelling and operatic drama; classic tales of good and evil, heroism and cowardice, triumph and defeat.

JJ Trek is not defined by either of the above. It's defined by special effects, absurd set design, absurdly conventional and over-the-top character drama, and absurd amounts of lens flares. In short, mediocrity ad absurdum.





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 12:13 | Message # 1738
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
Roddenberry tried to use modern scientific knowledge and theoretical science more during the writing of TNG. He wanted to make it as close to reality as possible.




Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 12:19 | Message # 1739
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote (DoctorOfSpace)
Roddenberry tried to use modern scientific knowledge and theoretical science more during the writing of TNG. He wanted to make it as close to reality as possible.

Yes, TNG was somewhat more proper on the science than the other series were, but the point remains that scientific accuracy is not a defining characteristic of Star Trek.





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
curiousepicDate: Thursday, 19.09.2013, 23:14 | Message # 1740
Space Pilot
Group: SE team
United States
Messages: 141
Status: Offline
http://the-toast.net/2013/09/03/another-lifeless-planet-found/

I hope one day, Space Engine's lifeless planets are just as interesting to explore as ones with Life!





My ideal preferences for visual design of the mothership and technology in SE
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality
 
Search: