ENG New site

Advanced search
[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Astrophotography
DeathStarDate: Tuesday, 17.02.2015, 17:15 | Message # 436
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
Quote spacer ()
This is how you see the sky in naked eye?!


Just because it is unedited does not mean that is how the human eye would see it.
 
WatsisnameDate: Wednesday, 18.02.2015, 01:12 | Message # 437
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Quote spacer ()
This is how you see the sky in naked eye?!


No, the camera picks up a lot more light than the eye can, especially with a long (this was 20s) exposure. The limiting visual magnitude here is about 6.0, whereas the faintest stars captured in the shot are about magnitude 9. You can also see comet Lovejoy and M33 (barely), which I've never been able to spot with my eyes.





 
midtskogenDate: Thursday, 19.02.2015, 20:08 | Message # 438
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Last night:


And the night before, another meteor and faint aurora:

Attachments: 9903725.jpg (154.7 Kb)





NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI


Edited by midtskogen - Thursday, 19.02.2015, 20:12
 
FireintheholeDate: Friday, 20.02.2015, 14:11 | Message # 439
Pioneer
Group: Translators
Sweden
Messages: 356
Status: Offline
Beautiful shot, as always Watsisname! smile
Quote spacer ()
This is how you see the sky in naked eye?!

A dark sky looks far more impressive to the naked eye ;)
Quote Watsisname ()
No, the camera picks up a lot more light than the eye can, especially with a long (this was 20s) exposure. The limiting visual magnitude here is about 6.0, whereas the faintest stars captured in the shot are about magnitude 9. You can also see comet Lovejoy and M33 (barely), which I've never been able to spot with my eyes.

Hm, with a NELM of +6 you should be able to distinguish M33. I did it myself under such conditions, with M33 being about 45 degrees over the horizon. Though averted vision was required.





Love SpaceEngine!

Edited by Fireinthehole - Friday, 20.02.2015, 14:11
 
WatsisnameDate: Friday, 20.02.2015, 21:12 | Message # 440
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
Quote Fireinthehole ()
A dark sky looks far more impressive to the naked eye ;)


Indeed it does. smile A truly dark sky even gives me an (obviously false) perception of depth to the sky, and I'm always amazed at how it can contain so many stars and yet still be so dark. Good old "Olber's paradox" mathematics for you.

Quote Fireinthehole ()
Hm, with a NELM of +6 you should be able to distinguish M33. I did it myself under such conditions, with M33 being about 45 degrees over the horizon. Though averted vision was required.


If you could spot it from a flat 6 then I'm impressed. smile At magnitude 5.7 the contrast between M33 and the background sky is very low (as evident by the long exposure), and so it is a considered a difficult averted vision target. I've never managed it, but I have a very hard time spotting diffuse objects with such low surface brightnesses in general. A half magnitude or more difference makes it a lot easier.





 
FireintheholeDate: Friday, 20.02.2015, 22:58 | Message # 441
Pioneer
Group: Translators
Sweden
Messages: 356
Status: Offline
Quote Fireinthehole ()
Indeed it does. A truly dark sky even gives me an (obviously false) perception of depth to the sky, and I'm always amazed at how it can contain so many stars and yet still be so dark. Good old "Olber's paradox" mathematics for you.

I remember the first time I saw a truly dark sky. The first thing I thought, was that I could not blame those in the middle ages, who believed all the stars were located at the same distance, because that was my impression too! smile
Quote Watsisname ()
If you could spot it from a flat 6 then I'm impressed. At magnitude 5.7 the contrast between M33 and the background sky is very low (as evident by the long exposure), and so it is a considered a difficult averted vision target. I've never managed it, but I have a very hard time spotting diffuse objects with such low surface brightnesses in general. A half magnitude or more difference makes it a lot easier.

I saw a star that I know have an apparent magnitude of about +6.1, and I saw M33 with averted vision. Very hard to see though, I was out for about 20 minutes before my eyes had got used to the darkness.





Love SpaceEngine!

Edited by Fireinthehole - Saturday, 21.02.2015, 11:34
 
SolarLinerDate: Sunday, 22.02.2015, 12:29 | Message # 442
Explorer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 267
Status: Offline
First capture from a guy on reddit at /r/space, using his new solar telescope. (So not mine unfortunately)



That's hot in all different kinds of ways.





custom landing page to share: http://bit.ly/spaceengine
 
midtskogenDate: Sunday, 22.02.2015, 18:18 | Message # 443
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
I noticed a red dot next to Venus tonight. It's Mars (had to look it up). That might create a good picture. Has anyone had a go?




NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
 
WatsisnameDate: Monday, 23.02.2015, 05:29 | Message # 444
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
I got this one the other day when they formed a trio with the Moon. Had some clouds though.






 
WatsisnameDate: Monday, 23.02.2015, 22:45 | Message # 445
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
I'd gone out this morning to shoot the Milky Way rising above a nearby mountain, when suddenly a bright auroral display exploded over the horizon. What a bonus! I've been wanting to see these for years, and I was literally moved to tears. The whole display lasted about 15 minutes and came at a time of minimal geomagnetic activity.











 
FastFourierTransformDate: Monday, 23.02.2015, 23:08 | Message # 446
Pioneer
Group: Local Moderators
Spain
Messages: 542
Status: Offline
Amazing! cry
 
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Monday, 23.02.2015, 23:21 | Message # 447
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
I wish I had a proper response to those images but I am at a loss for words surprised




Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
midtskogenDate: Tuesday, 24.02.2015, 00:33 | Message # 448
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
Wow! Great shots. A pity with that aurora spoiling the view of the Milky Way. wink




NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
 
Rhysy27Date: Tuesday, 24.02.2015, 08:27 | Message # 449
Space Tourist
Group: Users
United Kingdom
Messages: 31
Status: Offline
These are great shots! I wanna see the aurora one day but I'd need to do a bit of travelling. May I ask what camera and lens you used to capture these shots?




"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
 
FireintheholeDate: Tuesday, 24.02.2015, 09:33 | Message # 450
Pioneer
Group: Translators
Sweden
Messages: 356
Status: Offline
Outstanding! It's not very often you can see both the Milky Way Centre and auroras at the same time smile




Love SpaceEngine!
 
Search: