Comets thread
|
|
HarbingerDawn | Date: Saturday, 09.08.2014, 13:38 | Message # 226 |
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| The gravity is so low that just by trying to spin the wheels you would push yourself off the ground and fly through space above the comet until you eventually hit the ground again. Even if you configured the wheels for maximum possible grip, the top speed and acceleration you could achieve would be so amazingly low, and the vehicle so complex, that it would be impractical.
If you want to move around, just have a normal spacecraft with thrusters, since the comet is practically a zero-g environment.
All forum users, please read this! My SE mods and addons Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
|
| |
SpaceEngineer | Date: Saturday, 16.08.2014, 20:40 | Message # 227 |
Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
| Cool size comparison with Los-Angeles city:
|
|
| |
DeathStar | Date: Saturday, 16.08.2014, 21:23 | Message # 228 |
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
| Imagine if that thing smacked into the Earth...
|
|
| |
spacer | Date: Saturday, 16.08.2014, 21:38 | Message # 229 |
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
| Quote DeathStar ( ) Imagine if that thing smacked into the Earth... rip DeathStar,
"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still" -carl sagan
-space engine photographer
|
|
| |
DoctorOfSpace | Date: Saturday, 16.08.2014, 21:50 | Message # 230 |
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
| Quote DeathStar ( ) Imagine if that thing smacked into the Earth...
Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
|
|
| |
midtskogen | Date: Sunday, 17.08.2014, 03:57 | Message # 231 |
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
| Big difference depending on whether it hits at 11 or 73 km/s. Not for LA, though.
NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
|
|
| |
Watsisname | Date: Sunday, 17.08.2014, 06:20 | Message # 232 |
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
| It won't, because its perihelion distance is well outside of Earth's orbit. If we somehow changed its orbital parameters just enough to intersect Earth's orbit and collide with us, then it would impact at ~20km/s, release ~20 gigatons TNT equivalent energy, and if it hit LA, would obliterate it and everything else within ~100 kilometers.
Bad as that might be, it would be a lot worse if it was the same size/speed asteroid. The comet's density is very low as it is only a very loosely consolidated body.
|
|
| |
HarbingerDawn | Date: Thursday, 11.09.2014, 17:45 | Message # 233 |
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Photo of 67P with Rosetta spacecraft elements in the foreground, taken by Philae.
All forum users, please read this! My SE mods and addons Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
|
| |
Destructor1701 | Date: Wednesday, 15.10.2014, 13:43 | Message # 234 |
Pioneer
Group: Users
Ireland
Messages: 533
Status: Offline
| I've been trying to refine the orbit of Siding Spring in Space Engine, to more accurately reflect reality (SE's version's closest approach to Mars is 500,000km, when in reality it'll pass about 70% closer, I believe).
I've tried various sets of orbital elements from around the web, but they're all wildly inaccurate in-game, with the comet AU away from Mars on the 19th... does anyone have any advice?
Here are the elements I'm currently using, which are supposed to be recent... Code Comet "Siding Spring/C2013 A1 (Siding Spring)" { ParentBody "Sol" CometType "C" AbsMagn 7.9 SlopeParam 8 Radius 2
Orbit { Epoch 2456955.839684192762 PericenterDist 1.398647410389588 Eccentricity 1.000688626405008 Inclination 129.0273584753412 AscendingNode 300.9763462911545 ArgOfPericenter 2.442757978652319 MeanAnomaly -0.003449276073378881 } }
Edited by Destructor1701 - Wednesday, 15.10.2014, 19:45 |
|
| |
Watsisname | Date: Thursday, 16.10.2014, 03:35 | Message # 235 |
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
| Quote HarbingerDawn ( ) Photo of 67P with Rosetta spacecraft elements in the foreground, taken by Philae.
I always love these style of images. It gives context, almost a feeling of actually being there.
|
|
| |
Destructor1701 | Date: Friday, 17.10.2014, 13:07 | Message # 236 |
Pioneer
Group: Users
Ireland
Messages: 533
Status: Offline
| 67p making its tail:
Edited by Destructor1701 - Friday, 17.10.2014, 13:07 |
|
| |
midtskogen | Date: Tuesday, 21.10.2014, 21:37 | Message # 237 |
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
| You can name Philae's landing site.
I submitted a proposal.
NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
|
|
| |
DeathStar | Date: Tuesday, 21.10.2014, 23:15 | Message # 238 |
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
| Quote midtskogen ( ) I submitted a proposal.
Me too! Best of luck.
|
|
| |
Destructor1701 | Date: Thursday, 23.10.2014, 01:25 | Message # 239 |
Pioneer
Group: Users
Ireland
Messages: 533
Status: Offline
| Opportunity imaged comet Siding Spring in the sky during the comet's closest approach (~130,000km) to Mars:
The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged the nucleus:
Edited by Destructor1701 - Thursday, 23.10.2014, 01:25 |
|
| |
midtskogen | Date: Thursday, 23.10.2014, 21:19 | Message # 240 |
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Norway
Messages: 1674
Status: Offline
| Quote DeathStar ( ) Me too! What name did you propose?
My submission was Collis Philarum (Philae's hill). Which seems logical to me, since Philae is what the place will be remembered for. Collis simply because I couldn't think of many ways to describe a part of a comet like that. And I chose a Latin name because it's a old tradition to give Latin names to places on solar system bodies.
NIL DIFFICILE VOLENTI
|
|
| |