|
SpaceEngine TODO List - Updated 14th Dec 2015
|
|
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Saturday, 12.01.2013, 13:32 | Message # 151 |
 Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Ignuus66, this has been suggested many times before, and as SpaceEngineer has said before:
Quote (SpaceEngineer) I should note: as long as SE is a scientifically accurate Universe simulator, then one day it will implement ALL space objects and phenomenon that are known to modern astronomy. So you may not bother yourself with questions like "will SE one day have meteor rain implemented". I guarantee that it WILL.
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
| DeamonStorm | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 02:55 | Message # 152 |
|
Observer
Group: Newbies
United Kingdom
Messages: 2
Status: Offline
| Hi all.
First of all, I can tell you that this is a stunning program, this and universe sandbox are going to be stunning to use in making some educational videos on Youtube. I also use Celestia and that is great too.
However, I took a trip to my favourite moon today, and noticed that something was missing. I went to Enceladus around Jupiter, and was dismayed to see that there was no Ice Geysers. Im hoping that someone can tell me that there is a mod that adds them into the program or if its even possible. I think that those Geysers are one of the most stunning features in our whole solar system.
Anyway, great program...peace to you all and happy trekking.
|
| |
| |
| Ignuus66 | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 03:05 | Message # 153 |
|
Space Tourist
Group: Users
Hungary
Messages: 28
Status: Offline
| My bad, didn't notice there were more pages on the search, now I feel foolish. Lesson learned
Hmm, What about a option/ button which switches your view to the infrared/ ultraviolet (as if you were viewing an image from the view of the corresponding telescope type)
Edited by Ignuus66 - Sunday, 13.01.2013, 03:05 |
| |
| |
| Solaris | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 03:26 | Message # 154 |
 World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
France
Messages: 731
Status: Offline
| Hello DeamonStorm, welcome to the forum. Please take a moment to read the forum rules.
Geysers are not implemented in SE yet, but they will be, see the TODO list.
Quote (SpaceEngineer) as long as SE is a scientifically accurate Universe simulator, then one day it will implement ALL space objects and phenomenon that are known to modern astronomy. So you may not bother yourself with questions like "will SE one day have meteor rain implemented". I guarantee that it WILL. |
| |
| |
| DeamonStorm | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 03:48 | Message # 155 |
|
Observer
Group: Newbies
United Kingdom
Messages: 2
Status: Offline
| Quote (Solaris) Hello DeamonStorm, welcome to the forum. Please take a moment to read the forum rules.
Geysers are not implemented in SE yet, but they will be, see the TODO list.
Hello, thanks. I was just wondering. Nevermind, I found them. I was zoomed in too far. 
Edited by DeamonStorm - Sunday, 13.01.2013, 03:51 |
| |
| |
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 10:10 | Message # 156 |
|
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Quote (Ignuus66) What about a option/ button which switches your view to the infrared/ ultraviolet (as if you were viewing an image from the view of the corresponding telescope type)
This has been suggested many times as well, and again SpaceEngineer's statement applies. Given an unlimited amount of time, literally everything known to science will be implemented in SE. Of course, some things will be added sooner than others, so they have to be prioritized, and I suspect that multi-spectral view modes of that sort will be pretty far down on the priority list since there are many more important and fundamental features that have not been added yet.
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 10:34 | Message # 157 |
|
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Quote (DeamonStorm) I went to Enceladus around Jupiter
An irrelevant distinction, but Enceladus is a moon of Saturn.
Also, I have moved this to the To-Do list thread.
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
| neutronium76 | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 11:05 | Message # 158 |
 World Builder
Group: Users
Greece
Messages: 718
Status: Offline
| Quote (SpaceEngineer) as long as SE is a scientifically accurate Universe simulator, then one day it will implement ALL space objects and phenomenon that are known to modern astronomy. So you may not bother yourself with questions like "will SE one day have meteor rain implemented". I guarantee that it WILL.
I was thinking about this statement (which gives chills in my spine nonetheless) and a frightening thought came to my mind: What if some very new/innovative features (such as lifecycle of planets/plate tectonics, stars(i.e transition to supernovas, neutronstars, formation of black holes), galaxy collisions, simulation of Big Bang, Parallel Universes, etc) cannot be supported by the current graphics client and/or programming language that Space Engineer is using to develop SE. Innevitably there will be a time where new graphics clients and/or programming languages/APIs/tools will be developed that will enable these more advanced features to be implemented. This may require the entire code to be rewritten. Of course I am sure that Space Engineer has already thought about this. But the thought that the entire Engine code may need to be rewritten/reprogrammed makes me  
PC1:Core i7 970@3.34GHz, 6 cores/12 threads, 12GB DDR3 RAM@1.34GHz, 2x(SLI) GTX-580 GPUs 3GB VRAM(GDDR5)@1GHz, OS:Win7x64SP1
PC2:Core2Quad X9770@3.2GHz, 2 cores/4 threads 4GB DDR2 RAM@1GHz, GTX-285 GPU 1GB VRAM(DDR3)@1.24GHz, OS:WinVistax64SP2
Edited by neutronium76 - Sunday, 13.01.2013, 11:14 |
| |
| |
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 11:14 | Message # 159 |
|
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Well not only that, but it is a matter of practical impossibility that SE will ever be able to truly include everything known to humanity. It simply can't be done. But the point is that that is the goal, and so anything that exists in nature is on the to-do list. As I wrote earlier though, ultimately some things must come before others, and some things will never get done. But certainly enough will get done to make this the world's standard by which universe simulators are judged!
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
| Red_River | Date: Sunday, 13.01.2013, 16:04 | Message # 160 |
 Astronaut
Group: Users
Canada
Messages: 56
Status: Offline
| Quote But certainly enough will get done to make this the world's standard by which universe simulators are judged!
Amen to that! (wait, what happened to all Bmen?)
|
| |
| |
| PlanetExplorer12 | Date: Sunday, 10.03.2013, 02:47 | Message # 161 |
 Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 68
Status: Offline
| i can't wait for the procedurally generated galaxies!
Jupiter is Awesome!
|
| |
| |
| Donatelo200 | Date: Sunday, 10.03.2013, 05:37 | Message # 162 |
|
Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 261
Status: Offline
| Procedural generated galaxies already exist in the current version 0.96.2.. Unless You mean procedural galaxy models the yes i can't wait for them either. Although i don't think they're planned to be put in for a bit.
CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 250GB
HDD: Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB
HDD: WD Blue 1TB (2012)
RAM: Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR 2x8GB
MBD: MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922)
|
| |
| |
| Joey_Penguin | Date: Sunday, 10.03.2013, 20:17 | Message # 163 |
 Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 311
Status: Offline
| A more realistic, physics-based planetary system generator is high on my wishlist, along with protoplanetary disks, lava, carbon and overall more varied worlds.
Careful. The PLATT Collective has spurs.
|
| |
| |
| PlanetExplorer12 | Date: Monday, 25.03.2013, 05:58 | Message # 164 |
|
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 68
Status: Offline
| I think the highest ones in the lists are the ones that will be done last though, because the already done features are at the bottom. So, it's gonna be a while until we have randomly generated galaxy/nebula models...
Jupiter is Awesome!
|
| |
| |
| Voekoevaka | Date: Monday, 25.03.2013, 22:14 | Message # 165 |
 World Builder
Group: SE team
France
Messages: 1016
Status: Offline
| SpaceEngineer have already started the work in procedural galaxy models, but it won't be in 0.97.
Quote (PlanetExplorer12) I think the highest ones in the lists are the ones that will be done last though, because the already done features are at the bottom. So, it's gonna be a while until we have randomly generated galaxy/nebula models...
I don't think. Features are put on the bottom when they're done, but the order of features is random.
Quote (ToDoList) Server database (work in progress)
Network system
Spaceship builder with physical testing of construction
Cockpit devices: orbital transfer calculator, hyperflight calculator, programmable autopilot, etc.
Docking system, remote control of units
Economics, harvesting of resources, refueling, building, etc
Weapons, combat system
Giant alien astroengineering constructions
Destruction of spaceships and buildings (modelling of thousands of fragments on the GPU), animation of explosions (gas dynamics simulation on GPU(?))
Advanced physics: jet propulsion, aerodynamics and hydrodynamics
Procedural life (?)
Procedural civilizations (?)
[done partially] Local database
[done partially] Loading of models (spaceships, buildings, etc.)
[done partially] Internal structure of ships and buildings (indoor-engine)
[done partially] Physics: collision detection, newtonian mechanics
[done partially] Space physics: gravity forces, orbital flight, hyperdriv
Do you think procedural civilisation could be done before procedural life ?
It seems the features are classed by apparent difficulty to implement.
Want some music of mine ? Please go here !
|
| |
| |
ENG
New site
United States 
United Kingdom 
Hungary 
France 
Greece 
Canada 