Errors concerning Sol system bodies
|
|
SpaceEngineer | Date: Sunday, 29.11.2015, 18:56 | Message # 46 |
Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
| steeljaw354, do you use 0.974?
The pluto system needs to be updated since we have gotten pics of it from new horizons. - done Ceres/Vesta need to have real surface textures not procuderal ones. - done Sunspots should be visible on all stars but brown dwarfs. - incorrect Would like to see rouge planets - planned Planets around black holes - done Add y dwarf star class - work in progress right now Add more new exoplanets - done
|
|
| |
FastFourierTransform | Date: Sunday, 29.11.2015, 21:53 | Message # 47 |
Pioneer
Group: Local Moderators
Spain
Messages: 542
Status: Offline
| Quote SpaceEngineer ( ) Add y dwarf star class - work in progress right now
Ohhh this is great!!!!!
|
|
| |
steeljaw354 | Date: Tuesday, 08.12.2015, 20:30 | Message # 48 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
| I think the developer should program in some "anomalies" like a cold terra or green star but make them really rare like .5% of the objects currently in space engine, would be cool too see some "anomalies" programmed to add a bit more to the sense of adventure you would get. Like Searching for these things.
Edited by steeljaw354 - Tuesday, 08.12.2015, 20:30 |
|
| |
HarbingerDawn | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 00:30 | Message # 49 |
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| steeljaw354, 1) that is totally off-topic for this thread, 2) cold terras and green stars are not realistic. SpaceEngine is about realism, why should something unrealistic be included?
All forum users, please read this! My SE mods and addons Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
|
| |
steeljaw354 | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 00:43 | Message # 50 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
| To add to the sense of adventure
|
|
| |
HarbingerDawn | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 00:51 | Message # 51 |
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Quote steeljaw354 ( ) To add to the sense of adventure By violating a core principle of the program?
All forum users, please read this! My SE mods and addons Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
|
| |
steeljaw354 | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 00:55 | Message # 52 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 862
Status: Offline
| What do you mean?
|
|
| |
HarbingerDawn | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 01:03 | Message # 53 |
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Quote steeljaw354 ( ) What do you mean? I already explained it: the focus of SpaceEngine is to portray the universe as realistically as possible. Intentionally adding unrealistic features undermines this purpose.
All forum users, please read this! My SE mods and addons Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
|
| |
JohnVV | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 01:08 | Message # 54 |
Space Tourist
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 36
Status: Offline
| well reality IS stranger than fiction just look at CG 67p -- the "rubber ducky" comet
BUT seriously things DO need to stay in the realm of reality and within the laws of Physics
now a "cold" earth like planet - there should be many in this Galaxy something like "Gliese 581/d "
Edited by JohnVV - Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 01:34 |
|
| |
JackDole | Date: Wednesday, 09.12.2015, 10:22 | Message # 55 |
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1742
Status: Offline
| Quote JohnVV ( ) "cold" earth like planet - there should be many in this Galaxy something like "Gliese 581/d " This reminded me to post this:
Quote JackDole ( ) My version of Gliese 581 d
Don't forget to look here.
|
|
| |
maxitoarchangel | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 09:47 | Message # 56 |
Observer
Group: Newbies
Pirate
Messages: 4
Status: Offline
| Orbits... what about orbits? Orbits change in time and interact each others depending bodies near, at least in our solar system. I tried Universe Sandbox2 even if isnt intended to be the same thing...but looks to deal with this, orbits looks like boucing around (hula hula) seen at enough fast timelapse. Wouldnt this add some extra accuracy to orbital moves?
I love this Project. Keep up the good work!
|
|
| |
Salvo | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 13:11 | Message # 57 |
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Italy
Messages: 1400
Status: Offline
| Quote maxitoarchangel ( ) Wouldnt this add some extra accuracy to orbital moves? It would add extra things to elaborate for your PC, and I could never be implemented with the current stage of SE.
Anyway, there is a thread for suggestions like this: http://en.spaceengine.org/forum/8-1386-1
The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
CPU: Intel Core i7 4770 GPU: ASUS Radeon R9 270 RAM: 8 GBs
(still don't know why everyone is doing this...)
Edited by Salvo - Monday, 21.03.2016, 13:12 |
|
| |
JohnVV | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 21:47 | Message # 58 |
Space Tourist
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 36
Status: Offline
| orbits could be improved using the JPL / NAIF spice data http://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/naif/index.html
but this will add a LOT!!!!! of gigabits to things like spacecraft planets and moons are rather small kernels but for example the Cassini orbiter is up to 22.5 GiB
all the planets and moons is about only 3 gig of data
Edited by JohnVV - Monday, 21.03.2016, 21:50 |
|
| |