SpaceX Missions Thread - Page 11

ENG

New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]

Page 11 of 12
«
1
2
…
9
10
11
12
»

SpaceX Missions Thread (Post/read about SpaceX mission operations)

SpaceX Missions Thread

DoctorOfSpace

Date: Friday, 02.09.2016, 17:47 | Message # 151

Galaxy Architect

Group: Global Moderators

Pirate

Messages: 3600

Status: Offline

Quote JackDole (

)

I really do not understand why cars are not already prohibited.

In economics there is something called cost-benefit analysis. While there may be millions of deaths worldwide that is statistically still quite low on overall population and the benefits for society far outweigh the cost. Motor vehicles save more lives each year than the amount of lives they take.

The vast majority of accidents are human error anyway, so instead of removing the vehicles you should remove the humans controlling them.

Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB

JackDole

Date: Friday, 02.09.2016, 18:49 | Message # 152

Star Engineer

Group: Local Moderators

Germany

Messages: 1742

Status: Offline

Quote DoctorOfSpace (

)

In economics there is something called cost-benefit analysis.

This is such a thing, with the cost-benefit.
For example, the fight against smoking, damages the economy.
Besides the tobacco industry, also the insurance companies, and thus all of us, because the cost of insurance must be provided by all of us.
Because if people do not smoke, they live longer, and cost the insurance more money. dry

The ideal citizen would be someone who on the day dead falls, where he is retired.
The best would be right outside the door of a funeral home. biggrin

And when it comes to wage a trillion dollar war, no one seems to ask about the cost-benefit ratio.
Although such a war, of course, has a benefit. He makes some people quite rich.

But I guess that does not belong in this thread.

(I wish these trillions of dollars would be spent on research. That would be a benefit!)

Don't forget to look here.

Edited by JackDole - Saturday, 03.09.2016, 07:57

Destructor1701

Date: Saturday, 03.09.2016, 01:32 | Message # 153

Pioneer

Group: Users

Ireland

Messages: 533

Status: Offline

Personally, I'm not as upset about this particular failure as I am about the knock-on effect it will have, particularly with public perceptions of the Mars announcement.

Prior to this, the post-conference news outlets were going to be saying "Despite suffering a setback in June 2015 with the in-flight loss of a Falcon 9 and its Dragon payload to the ISS, SpaceX has spent the last 11 months heaping milestone upon milestone, recovering 6 first stage boosters and preparing for the first re-flight of a used orbit-class rocket in October. This trend of successes lends credence to the outrageously ambitious plans laid out in Mexico at the International Astronautical Congress on the 27th. Randy Carmichael, CNN, Guadalajara."... or something like that.

Now, it'll be "Eccentric billionaire Elon Musk today outlined his wildly ambitious plans to colonise Mars. He aims to start landing people on the Red Planet within 10 years, but the timing of this conference - 3 weeks after the high-profile destruction of a Falcon 9 on the pad in Florida - may cause many to wonder if these plans will also go... up in smoke. Spiven Horowitz, CBS News, the Depths of Despair.

Maybe I am overdramatising the potential impact, but it feels like SpaceX's core mission stands on a knife-edge. I want to see it now, and I want them to execute it on schedule (fat chance!!!), so this is upsetting me.

Edited by Destructor1701 - Saturday, 03.09.2016, 01:43

spacer

Date: Saturday, 03.09.2016, 10:02 | Message # 154

Star Engineer

Group: Users

Israel

Messages: 1258

Status: Offline

i guess spacex would be ok and move on. every space agency had accidents.
but on other hand the israel space agency will struggle surviving now. all money goes to sucurity now and almost nothing to space agency. also that satellite destraction means that the old satellitle need to still work, and there could be problems in the future in internet and t.v here.
the government will do in few days Emergency meeting about that.

lets hope for a new satellite plans

"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer

Destructor1701

Date: Saturday, 03.09.2016, 13:46 | Message # 155

Pioneer

Group: Users

Ireland

Messages: 533

Status: Offline

Quote spacer (

)

i guess spacex would be ok and move on.

I have no doubt of that. I don't expect the company to fold because of this - but I do expect delays, and possibly a slight change in culture (though I hope not).

Spacecom, however, the Israeli company that owned Amos-6, has been taking a pounding on the stock market since the explosion, and a takeover deal where they were to be bought out by a Chinese company is now expected to fall through.

Spacer, I wasn't aware Amos-6 was replacing an older bird - which one?

Optimism re SpaceX delays: If this turns out to be a procedural error in the ground-side equipment (ie, a poorly-secured hose), or a mechanical error with same, the rocket may be blameless. If so, I don't expect ground-side design or procedure alterations to delay the next flight anywhere near as much as a rocket design issue.
Launch Complex 39A, next door at Kennedy Space Centre (the main Apollo/Shuttle pad) is leased by SpaceX and renovations to support the Falcon line are nearing completion. It's projected to be ready for flight in November, and SpaceX have said they will switch all commercial operations to that pad until SLC-40 is back up and running.

Originally, they were only going to use 39A for Falcon Heavy and Crewed flights of the Falcon 9 - I feel that was a policy partially informed by a sense of veneration and respect for such an incredibly historic pad. Now it's their only option for reaching the ISS and Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (the destination for most of their recent commercial satellite launches), and will temporarily become the workhorse pad - assuming they are able to return the Falcon line to flight before SLC-40 can be repaired.

Edited by Destructor1701 - Saturday, 03.09.2016, 13:49

DoctorOfSpace

Date: Saturday, 03.09.2016, 18:35 | Message # 156

Galaxy Architect

Group: Global Moderators

Pirate

Messages: 3600

Status: Offline

Same video as above but with the sound synced

Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB

spacer

Date: Saturday, 03.09.2016, 18:44 | Message # 157

Star Engineer

Group: Users

Israel

Messages: 1258

Status: Offline

Quote Destructor1701 (

)

Spacer, I wasn't aware Amos-6 was replacing an older bird - which one?

amos 6 was meant to replace the old age amos 2 satellite. that allready 13 years in space.
now we needed to replace it. but we cant now....so we must keep amos 2 alive for more years, if it wont survive we may lose t.v connections and more.

Quote

Transmission and communication services given by this satellite include: direct distribution of TV and radio translations, TV and radio translations to communication centers, distribution of internet services, data transmissions to communication networks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amos-2

there was also amos 5 satellite that was built in russia. it was new (2011) but last year it died.
so nothing left

"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer

Edited by spacer - Saturday, 03.09.2016, 18:46

DoctorOfSpace

Date: Saturday, 17.09.2016, 23:10 | Message # 158

Galaxy Architect

Group: Global Moderators

Pirate

Messages: 3600

Status: Offline

Thunderf00t explosion analysis

Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB

Watsisname