ENG New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
Work progress - 0.9.8.1
DeathStarDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 01:21 | Message # 181
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
arbazarit, it does look good, that I admit. However, the only real major differences I see between this and SE is:

1. Volumetric clouds
2. Detailed terrain up-close with rocks scattered about

Number 1. is likely to be added in the not-too-distant future, considering that the necessary tech has been added literally just a few days ago(see posts above).

An interesting thing to note: while the FPS is buttery-smooth in the video, the PC it was recorded on is very beefy, IIRC. I think if you put the same game on an average computer and wanted decent FPS, as it stands, it probably wouldn't look nearly as pretty. Those are just my assumptions, of course.


Edited by DeathStar - Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 01:21
 
Destructor1701Date: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 02:56 | Message # 182
Pioneer
Group: Users
Ireland
Messages: 533
Status: Offline
There looks to be some erosion or at least modelling of historic liquid flow going on - look at the patterns of the snow lying on the land. The texturing is phenomenal.

But yeah, those three things plus flora and shadows and other post processing stuff, and SE would be caught up.





 
fongjhDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 03:37 | Message # 183
Observer
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 10
Status: Offline
If stars will be able to go supernova at specific times, then the planets orbiting them will need to become evaporating planets when they get hit by the shockwave. SE would then need to be able to calculate how long it takes for each planet to evaporate completely based on its mass and proximity to the supernova.

Will the new volumetric shaders also be able to render planetary nebulae as spherical shells that are opaque at the edges and transparent in the middle?
 
InariusDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 07:03 | Message # 184
Explorer
Group: Local Moderators
France
Messages: 237
Status: Offline
Considering the budget and the manpower of star citizen it seems normal that it is more impressive than a single man work.

But, though, it's still...baffling and amazing. I hope the game will look like this and that we won't have another no man's sky...
 
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 07:11 | Message # 185
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
Quote Inarius ()
we won't have another no man's sky


Can we please stop doing this?

For 3 months now SE has continually been brought up in comparison to No Man's Sky, it is getting to be quite an annoyance.





Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
sinsforealDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 09:29 | Message # 186
Space Pilot
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 129
Status: Offline
DoctorOfSpace,You are absolutely right. Space engine will never be no mans sky, And that's a good thing. No mans sky was compete garbage, why are we trying to put garbage on a pedestal to make space engine live upto? Space engine will never be worse than no mans sky because it is already better, And it will only get better in time to come.




"Man once looked up at the stars and wondered, Now all we do is look at our hands and hesitate"
 
PrzeszczepDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 10:43 | Message # 187
Space Tourist
Group: Users
Poland
Messages: 22
Status: Offline
Quote Duke ()
You can check performance for example on this Shadertoy shader. For now SE implementation is close to it but I hope it will be improved.

60 fps, now what?





CPU: Intel Core i5 4690K | GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 | RAM: 8 GB
 
DeathStarDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 13:52 | Message # 188
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
I have an easy 60 FPS when the screen is small, but when I fullscreen it falls down to around 10 FPS at best. Is this normal?

Edited by DeathStar - Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 13:53
 
DoctorOfSpaceDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 18:01 | Message # 189
Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
DeathStar, no it is not normal, but resolution is one of the largest resource hogs. What kind of PC are you running?




Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
 
InariusDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 19:38 | Message # 190
Explorer
Group: Local Moderators
France
Messages: 237
Status: Offline
Quote
Can we please stop doing this?


Quote
I hope the game will look like this and that we won't have another no man's sky...


Don't be so defensive. I wasn't writing about SE but about Star Citizen. If you read my message you would have seen that i was telling that it was normal that it (Star Citizen) was looking more impressive than a single dev game (SE). But I was hoping the game (Star Citizen) will look like this (the youtube video) and that we won't have another man's sky (with Star Citizen). A big game with a big budget, big hopes, and big disappointments.

I would be very surprised if Space Engine look as detailled and as good as this video of Star Citizen. If it would be the case, it would mean that a single developer can do better than 365 people, which (as high as I estimate Space Engineers) would be...well...you know.

But, on the other side, I do hope SE will have other qualities, on several other aspects.
Considering that I am a fellow player of Dwarf Fortress, I think you can guess where my preferences lies between good features and good looking.
 
DeathStarDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 20:15 | Message # 191
Pioneer
Group: Users
Croatia
Messages: 515
Status: Offline
Quote DoctorOfSpace ()
DeathStar, no it is not normal, but resolution is one of the largest resource hogs. What kind of PC are you running?


Specs:

AMD Athlon II X4 750k CPU
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
4GB RAM
Windows 10 64bit

It might be a little bit on the lower side...

Quote Inarius ()
I would be very surprised if Space Engine look as detailled and as good as this video of Star Citizen. If it would be the case, it would mean that a single developer can do better than 365 people, which (as high as I estimate Space Engineers) would be...well...you know.


Eh, give it 4 years, and I fully believe that SE can have planets as detailed as SC has currently. Sure, SE has far less developers, but SC devs have to focus on a lot of other gameplay features as well.


Edited by DeathStar - Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 20:21
 
spacerDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 20:24 | Message # 192
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
Quote DeathStar ()
but SC devs have to focus on a lot of other gameplay features as well.

true, while they focus on creating a game with gameplay. SE focused more on the simulator and realism of the universe





"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan

-space engine photographer
 
DukeDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 21:15 | Message # 193
Space Pilot
Group: SE team
Antarctica
Messages: 88
Status: Offline
Quote spacer ()
what about the non procedural nebulas? will they stay as they are now or
you will be able to make them with duke shaders?

I think that they may be adapted, but more research is needed.

Quote DeathStar ()
AMD Athlon II X4 750k CPU
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
4GB RAM
Windows 10 64bit

You have a bit of a weak video card, but I hope that optimizations in SE will give a reasonably good frame rate with new nebulae on your PC too.
 
HornblowerDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 21:28 | Message # 194
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
Duke, Are all these nebula going to be Planetary and SNR nebulae? Or will there be diffuse nebulae as well?
 
EliamDate: Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 21:34 | Message # 195
Observer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 11
Status: Offline
Procedural volumetric clouds will perhaps one day allow Space Engine to render gas giant upper atmosphere... I can"t wait ^^


Shadow of Io by Sirgerg- Jupiter upper atmosphere artist rendering


Neptune Skies by Sirgerg


Ringshine from Erik Wernquist amazing WANDERERS


Edited by Eliam - Wednesday, 12.10.2016, 21:35
 
Search: