ENG New site

Advanced search
[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
MOD - Creating galaxies, nebulae and star clusters 0.980
BlackeyeDate: Friday, 30.05.2014, 20:32 | Message # 106
Astronaut
Group: Users
Germany
Messages: 49
Status: Offline
w...t...f.... i try it too :O
 
kallas_333Date: Saturday, 13.09.2014, 14:29 | Message # 107
Observer
Group: Newbies
Pirate
Messages: 9
Status: Offline
Soooo... i tried to make the biggest galaxy in the universe (aprox. 2 Mega parsecs diameter)
Custom texture and model but i seem to have a small problem... when i get into the humongous galaxy the stars are separated by hundreds of parsecs from one another and i was wandering if there is a way to fix it without reducing the size of the galaxy...









Edited by kallas_333 - Saturday, 13.09.2014, 14:40
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 13.09.2014, 20:14 | Message # 108
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Quote kallas_333 ()
i was wandering if there is a way to fix it without reducing the size of the galaxy...

No

Also, I thought the largest galaxy was IC 1101, which is already in SE?





All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
kallas_333Date: Saturday, 13.09.2014, 21:00 | Message # 109
Observer
Group: Newbies
Pirate
Messages: 9
Status: Offline
Quote kallas_333 ()
Also, I thought the largest galaxy was IC 1101, which is already in SE?


Here i wanted to make a fictional biggest galaxy in the universe not the biggest galaxy discovered in reality...

And IC 1101 suffers the same bug as the Rastra galaxy - Stars every hundred parsecs or so - ...


Edited by kallas_333 - Saturday, 13.09.2014, 21:05
 
SpaceEngineerDate: Sunday, 14.09.2014, 20:38 | Message # 110
Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
SE can't handle such big galaxies directly, so it made a cheat and reduce the density of stars.




 
PlutonianEmpireDate: Monday, 15.12.2014, 02:42 | Message # 111
Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 475
Status: Offline
Question: Does SE use the custom models as the base for the distribution of all stars in that galaxy, or just the blue stars?

Added (15.12.2014, 01:42)
---------------------------------------------
Also, does adding too many custom galaxy models mess up the procedural generator? Because when I added a second galaxy model after my first custom model, I noticed the saved locations were suddenly obsolete, and as some of the bookmarks would just not work, while others would link to an entirely different system with the same name, multiple megaparsecs away from the original location.




Specs: Dell Inspiron 5547 (Laptop); 8 gigabytes of RAM; Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz; Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit; Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics 4400 (That's all there is :( )
 
SpaceEngineerDate: Monday, 15.12.2014, 10:08 | Message # 112
Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
Quote PlutonianEmpire ()
Question: Does SE use the custom models as the base for the distribution of all stars in that galaxy, or just the blue stars?

Blue stars. Red and yellow dwarfs do not noticeably follow the spiral structure.

Quote PlutonianEmpire ()
Also, does adding too many custom galaxy models mess up the procedural generator?

Yes if you add a galaxy, the Milky Way may change its internal number from 8404 to something else, so a star called RS 8408-xxx may change its name and saved location will point on a star in another galaxy. You may repair locations by figuring out the new number of the Milky Way and editing the places.cfg.





 
PlutonianEmpireDate: Monday, 15.12.2014, 20:15 | Message # 113
Pioneer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 475
Status: Offline
Quote SpaceEngineer ()
Yes if you add a galaxy, the Milky Way may change its internal number from 8404 to something else, so a star called RS 8408-xxx may change its name and saved location will point on a star in another galaxy. You may repair locations by figuring out the new number of the Milky Way and editing the places.cfg.

Gotcha. I went ahead and experimented a bit, and I figured out that when a new galaxy is added, the number SE gives it is sometimes taken from another, existing catalog galaxy, pushing the numbers of that galaxy and all the numbers for the galaxies after that number are bumped up by one. So if the MW previously had 8404-xxxx, and a new galaxy is inserted that has a number below 8404, MW would then thereafter have 8405-xxxx, and so forth. I don't think procedural galaxies are affected, but I could be wrong. smile

Thanks for the help! smile





Specs: Dell Inspiron 5547 (Laptop); 8 gigabytes of RAM; Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz; Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit; Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics 4400 (That's all there is :( )

Edited by PlutonianEmpire - Monday, 15.12.2014, 20:17
 
astronikiDate: Monday, 09.03.2015, 20:33 | Message # 114
Space Pilot
Group: SE team
Poland
Messages: 115
Status: Offline
What does floatLOD and LODbase parameters do exactly?




Check out my astrophotography:
http://www.astroniki.fbl.pl
http://www.facebook.com/AstroNiki1
 
sent808Date: Friday, 29.05.2015, 20:43 | Message # 115
Astronaut
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 55
Status: Offline
Guys one question: How i can make a galaxy with disk size 100% bulge 5% from a Sb?? because in models is set up to 20%. I try to decrease it to 5% or 8% and instant bug i cant see the galaxy just the bulge.

I just want to expand the arms of the galaxy or like i said decrease the bulge. Thakçnks.
 
Timo3681Date: Saturday, 04.07.2015, 18:28 | Message # 116
Astronaut
Group: Users
Germany
Messages: 40
Status: Offline
If i make own Nebula, why emParticleColor, absParticleColor and bParticleColor not work? If i made for example:

Nebula "Example Nebula"
{
Galaxy "Milky Way"
Type "Diffuse"
RA -69 45 53.45
Dec 10 38 27.72
Dist 0
Radius 25
AbsMagn -4.2
Quat ( 0.147, 0.-0.566, 0.699, 0.412 )
emParticleColor (1.00, 1.00, 0.00)
absParticleColor (0.00, 1.00, 0.00)
bParticleColor (1.00, 0.00, 1.00)
}





Exploration:

Star Systems: 11
Planets: 55
Moons: 153
Terra: 3
Water: 6
Desert: 23
Titan: 8
Giants: 27
Selena: 73
Ice: 82
Stars without Planets: 2
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 04.07.2015, 21:20 | Message # 117
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
Timo3681, those parameters go into the nebula model file, not the catalog file. You use those when creating a nebula model.




All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
Timo3681Date: Saturday, 04.07.2015, 21:36 | Message # 118
Astronaut
Group: Users
Germany
Messages: 40
Status: Offline
@HarbingerDawn: If i make for example emParticleColor (1.0, 1.0, 0.0) and absParticleColor (0.00, 0.00, 1.0) in Nebula model file (Models.cfg), parameters not work Nebula have old color, not yellow and blue.




Exploration:

Star Systems: 11
Planets: 55
Moons: 153
Terra: 3
Water: 6
Desert: 23
Titan: 8
Giants: 27
Selena: 73
Ice: 82
Stars without Planets: 2
 
HarbingerDawnDate: Saturday, 04.07.2015, 22:53 | Message # 119
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
If you're modifying an existing model, you have to delete the old model from the cache first, in cache/models/nebulae/.




All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
 
Timo3681Date: Sunday, 05.07.2015, 06:17 | Message # 120
Astronaut
Group: Users
Germany
Messages: 40
Status: Offline
Models.cfg have more Diffuse Nebula, not only one. How can i change from M16 to for example Flame Nebula?




Exploration:

Star Systems: 11
Planets: 55
Moons: 153
Terra: 3
Water: 6
Desert: 23
Titan: 8
Giants: 27
Selena: 73
Ice: 82
Stars without Planets: 2


Edited by Timo3681 - Sunday, 05.07.2015, 06:24
 
Search: