ENG New site

Advanced search

[ New messages · Forum rules · Members ]
New galaxies!!
OstariskDate: Thursday, 16.06.2016, 21:49 | Message # 166
Pioneer
Group: Users
Australia
Messages: 451
Status: Offline
Nah. Make NGC 4450:






My mods
 
KexittDate: Thursday, 16.06.2016, 21:50 | Message # 167
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
Very blurry




http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
 
OstariskDate: Thursday, 16.06.2016, 22:13 | Message # 168
Pioneer
Group: Users
Australia
Messages: 451
Status: Offline
Quote Kexitt ()
Very blurry

Looks hi-res to me.... ?






My mods
 
KexittDate: Thursday, 16.06.2016, 22:19 | Message # 169
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
If I wil crop the picture to get only galaxy in it, I will get 587x587 picture. It's small enough to be called blurry




http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
 
OstariskDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 00:42 | Message # 170
Pioneer
Group: Users
Australia
Messages: 451
Status: Offline
Quote Kexitt ()
If I wil crop the picture to get only galaxy in it, I will get 587x587 picture. It's small enough to be called blurry

I see.

Make Arp 147:


The only pictures I could find are grainy, though.






My mods


Edited by Ostarisk - Friday, 17.06.2016, 02:43
 
RoswellDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 02:09 | Message # 171
Pioneer
Group: Users
Canada
Messages: 500
Status: Offline
Not bad. I hope you can fix it to reduce lag
 
OstariskDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 02:42 | Message # 172
Pioneer
Group: Users
Australia
Messages: 451
Status: Offline
Quote Roswell ()
I hope you can fix it to reduce lag

It lags because the image is huge - more than 2000 x 2000 pixels. But anyways, fixed.






My mods
 
RoswellDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 03:25 | Message # 173
Pioneer
Group: Users
Canada
Messages: 500
Status: Offline
Quote Ostarisk ()
It lags because the image is huge - more than 2000 x 2000 pixels. But anyways, fixed.

Oh my god it's huge. I didn't know. shok
 
KexittDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 10:41 | Message # 174
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
Quote Roswell ()
huge

No it isn't. HUGE is some Hubble's pictures such as picture of M 81(22620x15200)
2000x2000 is really small, because galaxy is not at center. Onlu galaxy is 587x587





http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
 
RoswellDate: Friday, 17.06.2016, 18:08 | Message # 175
Pioneer
Group: Users
Canada
Messages: 500
Status: Offline
Quote Kexitt ()
No it isn't. HUGE is some Hubble's pictures such as picture of M 81(22620x15200)
2000x2000 is really small, because galaxy is not at center. Onlu galaxy is 587x587


lol why Ostarist tell me "2000x2000" shok


Edited by Roswell - Friday, 17.06.2016, 18:09
 
n0b0dyDate: Monday, 20.06.2016, 18:57 | Message # 176
Explorer
Group: Users
Pirate
Messages: 297
Status: Offline
I finally managed to find, convert for SE and add the missing catalog data for galaxy PGC 54493 so that it does not give an error message in the console.

Please copy / paste the code below at the end of the entries inside the file YourSEfolder\addons\catalogs\galaxies\KexittCatalog.sc :
Code

Galaxy "PGC 54493/2MASX J15161917+0709442/CGCG 049-082/SDSS J151619.14+070944.4/USGC U695 NED19"
{
       Type    "S0"
       RA       15 16 19.171
       Dec      +07 09 44.22
       Dist     150200000
       Radius   18572.5
       AbsMagn  -15.1
       Quat   ( -0.447555 -0.2271491 -0.7253387 0.4711491 )
}


Data acquired from:
Source 1 and Source 2.

Please feel free to verify for mistakes as this is not my area of expertise. Apologies for any omissions / mistakes and all credit goes to Kexitt, and SpaceEngineer of course. smile
 
KexittDate: Monday, 20.06.2016, 19:12 | Message # 177
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
n0b0dy, I wanted to do it later, but thank you!




http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
 
HornblowerDate: Tuesday, 21.06.2016, 22:24 | Message # 178
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 714
Status: Offline
Can you do Arp 299?
 
RoswellDate: Wednesday, 22.06.2016, 00:33 | Message # 179
Pioneer
Group: Users
Canada
Messages: 500
Status: Offline
Oh wow that cool :O
 
SpaceHopperDate: Saturday, 25.06.2016, 15:22 | Message # 180
Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 186
Status: Offline
Here's something that needs addressing:
NGC 218 (whose model you already have) and PGC 2726 (which you currently don't have in your .pak file in the starter post)
PGC 2726 looks like this, unless you look back through the thread to find its model (which I did after this photo was taken):


(I mean, some people are too lazy to go through the entire thread to download stuff that's missing.)

Attachments: 7624376.jpg (153.7 Kb)





3.14% of all seafarers are PIrates.
***
Got Mole Problems? Call Avogadro at 602-1023
***
Google Search my picture to discover whom it depicteth.


Edited by SpaceHopper - Saturday, 25.06.2016, 15:24
 
Search: