|
New galaxies!!
|
|
| SpaceHopper | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 18:36 | Message # 16 |
 Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 186
Status: Offline
| How come in the catalog files there's no UGC 12158 or AM 0500-620? Because I looked in the catalog and couldn't find those galaxies, even though you have models for them.
Edit: Oh, and one other thing. In the catalog files NGC 5679C is listed as an E0 galaxy, but it must be listed as an Irr galaxy for the model to work.
3.14% of all seafarers are PIrates.
***
Got Mole Problems? Call Avogadro at 602-1023
***
Google Search my picture to discover whom it depicteth.
Edited by SpaceHopper - Monday, 21.03.2016, 18:50 |
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 18:50 | Message # 17 |
 Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| I haven't add them into the catalog because after adding I have a lot of problems with saved places.
Quote Galaxy "AM 0500-620"
{
Type "Sb"
RA 05.0033
Dec -62.0350
Dist 117734935
Radius 23531.6
AbsMagn -20.6
//Yaw 13.2
//Pitch 27.7
//Roll 34.5
Quat ( -0.9269889 0.2641924 0.03661448 0.2637298 )
}
Galaxy "UGC 12158/MCG +03-57-032/PGC 069533"
{
Type "Sb"
RA 22.42105
Dec 19.5949
Dist 121999761
Radius 37549
AbsMagn -15.3
//Yaw 13.2
//Pitch 27.7
//Roll 34.5
Quat ( -0.9895334 -0.0258 0.004686 0.1885667 )
}
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 18:59 | Message # 18 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| And NGC 5679
Quote Galaxy "NGC 5679/NGC 5679B/UGC 9383/MCG 1-37-35"
{
Type "Sb"
RA 14.5856
Dec 5.3592
Dist 122641000
Radius 19416.8506
AbsMagn -21.62
Quat ( 0.820371 0.4476847 -0.3534955 0.04013243 )
}
Galaxy "NGC 5679A/MCG 1-37-34/VV 458/Arp 274"
{
Type "Sb"
RA 14.585186
Dec 5.353622
Dist 122640558
Radius 11794.8246
AbsMagn -20.53
Quat ( -0.2665324 0.2700244 -0.9211085 -0.08721526 )
}
Galaxy "NGC 5679C/Arp 274/VV 458"
{
Type "Irr"
RA 14.58611
Dec 5.362734
Dist 122640558
Radius 11653.7896
AbsMagn -20.13
Quat ( -0.382358 -0.1862653 -0.9040858 0.04167081 )
}
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| SpaceHopper | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 19:24 | Message # 19 |
|
Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 186
Status: Offline
| Quote Kexitt (  ) I haven't add them into the catalog because after adding I have a lot of problems with saved places.
I know how to fix that. Try moving the first number in the RS code (the galaxy's code) up or down by a couple of digits. I remember having to do this as early as 0.97, when Voekoevaka would put up new galaxy catalog mods and I would have to change all instances of "RS 8404-" in the places.cfg file to "RS 8408-" (at the time, the Milky Way had that code). It will be better to do the larger numbers first, so you don't get confused about which ones you corrected and which ones you didn't. Do the same for your user-eng-db.cfg file, if you have renamed some procedural planets and stars that you found.
Edit: By the way, about NGC 5679 A-D...They're not actually interacting (they're just overlapping, like NGC 3314 A/B here), so I wouldn't put their distances too close together.
Edit 2: Speaking of galaxy catalogs, here is a real galaxy (actually, the host galaxy of a quasar) that I added on my own and that others might want to add:
Code Quasar "3C273"
{
Type "E4"
RA 12 29 6.7
Dec 02 03 09
Dist 749034007.12
Radius 40021.7
AppMagn 16
AbsMagn -26.7
SolFade 1
}
And a little history...3C273 was the first quasar identified by humans.
3.14% of all seafarers are PIrates.
***
Got Mole Problems? Call Avogadro at 602-1023
***
Google Search my picture to discover whom it depicteth.
Edited by SpaceHopper - Monday, 21.03.2016, 19:36 |
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Monday, 21.03.2016, 19:32 | Message # 20 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| SpaceHopper,  Thanks
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| SpaceHopper | Date: Thursday, 31.03.2016, 16:43 | Message # 21 |
|
Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 186
Status: Offline
| Hey, maybe you could add PGC 2726? Because one of the galaxies that you added, NGC 218, is interacting with PGC 2726, hence its unusual shape. I would give PGC 2726 an SBx galaxy type, because of its bar.
3.14% of all seafarers are PIrates.
***
Got Mole Problems? Call Avogadro at 602-1023
***
Google Search my picture to discover whom it depicteth.
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Thursday, 31.03.2016, 16:59 | Message # 22 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| SpaceHopper, Ok. Tomorrow it will be done.
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Monday, 04.04.2016, 14:04 | Message # 23 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| .PAK file will be here soon 
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Tuesday, 05.04.2016, 12:23 | Message # 24 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| Not soon because I have some problems. 
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
| DoctorOfSpace | Date: Tuesday, 05.04.2016, 12:29 | Message # 25 |
 Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
Pirate
Messages: 3600
Status: Offline
| What issues are you having?
Intel Core i7-5820K 4.2GHz 6-Core Processor
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory
EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC 6GB
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Tuesday, 05.04.2016, 12:31 | Message # 26 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| The 1st and 2nd lines are fixed
It's happening always with PAK file. Before I put all files to the archive there was no problems.
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
Edited by Kexitt - Tuesday, 05.04.2016, 12:33 |
| |
| |
| SpaceHopper | Date: Wednesday, 06.04.2016, 21:22 | Message # 27 |
|
Explorer
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 186
Status: Offline
| Maybe you should upload the PAK file, so somebody (not me, cause it's not something I'm skilled at) can fix it so that it can work properly.
3.14% of all seafarers are PIrates.
***
Got Mole Problems? Call Avogadro at 602-1023
***
Google Search my picture to discover whom it depicteth.
|
| |
| |
| JackDole | Date: Friday, 08.04.2016, 13:58 | Message # 28 |
 Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1742
Status: Offline
| Kexitt,
beautyfull galaxies. 
You need your 'Models.cfg' not name 'Models.cfg', you can also name it 'kexittModels.cfg' for example.
In your textures is missing 'smc_posx.png'. Either rename 'SMC.png' or add 'smc_posx.png'.
Also missing:
"NGC4449_negx.*"
"NGC4449_negz.*"
"NGC4449_negy.*"
"Sa3_small.*"
"Sa3_sys.*"
Regarding the problem with your .pak file, it's a bug.
Quote SpaceEngineer ( ) Note what galaxy/nebula models does not work if packed into pak file due to bug (in RC2).
But I think it would be enough if you publish the textures as .pak file - I myself have created me a .pak file with your textures.
The 'galaxiesKexitt.sc' and 'modelsKexitt.cfg' can be packed directly into the appropriate folder.
Don't forget to look here.
|
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Friday, 08.04.2016, 15:13 | Message # 29 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| Quote JackDole ( ) if you publish the textures as .pak file
I will. If you want to install galaxies all you have to do is unpack the archive. Also soon I will post some new galaxies(for RC1. All of these galaxies will be included to archive)
Quote JackDole ( ) "NGC4449_negx.*"
"NGC4449_negz.*"
"NGC4449_negy.*"
"Sa3_small.*"
"Sa3_sys.*"
I have made a new Sa3. NGC 4449 isn't need negx\y\z textures.
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
Edited by Kexitt - Friday, 08.04.2016, 15:23 |
| |
| |
| Kexitt | Date: Saturday, 09.04.2016, 12:15 | Message # 30 |
|
Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 398
Status: Offline
| I HATE NOTEPAD++!!!!!!!!!!
It removed EVERYTHING from models.cfg!!!
So I have to make my galaxies again! (galaxies I made, but don't published)
http://kexitt.deviantart.com/
|
| |
| |
ENG
New site
United States 
Russian Federation 
Pirate 
Germany