|
Challenge: Most stars in one galaxy
|
|
| spacer | Date: Friday, 03.05.2013, 12:29 | Message # 1 |
 Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
| You need to find a galaxy with a lot of stars
"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan
-space engine photographer
|
| |
| |
| Billy_Mayes | Date: Friday, 03.05.2013, 12:30 | Message # 2 |
 Pioneer
Group: Users
Finland
Messages: 485
Status: Offline
| I don't think this is possible, since there are way too many stars to count in any galaxy.
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz Quad-Core - AMD Radeon HD 6950 2GB VRAM - 4GB RAM - 1680x1050 75 Hz Samsung screen
|
| |
| |
| spacer | Date: Friday, 03.05.2013, 12:51 | Message # 3 |
|
Star Engineer
Group: Users
Israel
Messages: 1258
Status: Offline
| Use wiki system on the galaxies. 
"we began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still"
-carl sagan
-space engine photographer
Edited by spacer - Friday, 03.05.2013, 12:52 |
| |
| |
| smjjames | Date: Friday, 03.05.2013, 15:07 | Message # 4 |
|
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 913
Status: Offline
| Easy, look for the biggest galaxy out there, most likely an elliptical.
|
| |
| |
| migratingmynah | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 02:30 | Message # 5 |
 Astronaut
Group: Users
Singapore
Messages: 44
Status: Offline
| Quote (Billy_Mayes) I don't think this is possible, since there are way too many stars to count in any galaxy.
Version 0.97 allows you to know how many stars there are in a galaxy...
Just right click on the galaxy then click info.
RG 0-2-14-921
13.682 trillion stars
Bye
Edited by migratingmynah - Saturday, 04.05.2013, 06:30 |
| |
| |
| smjjames | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 16:07 | Message # 6 |
|
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 913
Status: Offline
| The Tadpole Galaxies is a probable winner at 256.799 trillion. Then again, it's a special case because it's actually the combined numbers from two colliding galaxies spread out over a huge area, so, should we include colliding galaxies in this?
|
| |
| |
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 16:14 | Message # 7 |
 Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| What about IC 1101 with 578.964 trillion?
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
| migratingmynah | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 16:29 | Message # 8 |
|
Astronaut
Group: Users
Singapore
Messages: 44
Status: Offline
| He should really state in the rules if it needs to be procedural or not.
Bye
|
| |
| |
| smjjames | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 16:36 | Message # 9 |
|
World Builder
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 913
Status: Offline
| Quote (migratingmynah) He should really state in the rules if it needs to be procedural or not.
And whether to include colliding galaxies (either as a whole if it's one object like the tadpole, or the combined number if they are generated as separate objects).
|
| |
| |
| Voekoevaka | Date: Saturday, 04.05.2013, 17:19 | Message # 10 |
 World Builder
Group: SE team
France
Messages: 1016
Status: Offline
| Quote (smjjames) The Tadpole Galaxies is a probable winner at 256.799 trillion. Then again, it's a special case because it's actually the combined numbers from two colliding galaxies spread out over a huge area, so, should we include colliding galaxies in this?
Tadpole galaxy is made of only one model (on the other hand, I made Antennae galaxy with two separate models). I don't think we could consider this galaxy as the winner of this challenge because generation of stars in model of collided galaxies is not accurate yet in SE.
Quote (migratingmynah) He should really state in the rules if it needs to be procedural or not.
That's a good rule. But even procedural galaxies are made with non-procedural models. Only their size is procedural. Just wait for procedural models of galaxies.
Want some music of mine ? Please go here !
|
| |
| |
ENG
New site
Israel 
Finland 
United States 
Singapore 
France