COMMUNITY ADDON - Double/Multiple Asteroids fixes for SE
|
|
JackDole | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 12:07 | Message # 76 |
Star Engineer
Group: Local Moderators
Germany
Messages: 1742
Status: Offline
| Silicon, Quote Silicon ( ) Is there a way to reload modifications made to .sc files without restarting SE? No, because the internal database and the hierarchy of the objects would have to be rebuild each time by SpaceEngine.
Don't forget to look here.
|
|
| |
Lucas0231 | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 16:04 | Message # 77 |
Explorer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| Quote Lucas0231 ( ) It's in SolarSys.sc, with Eris, Haumea and the other planets. Eventually if some other big candidate will be declared dwarf planet, it should be moved in SolarSys.sc and from the list as well. Ok.
|
|
| |
Silicon | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 17:15 | Message # 78 |
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 51
Status: Offline
| Quote Lucas0231 ( ) Surface { SurfStyle 0.148692 OceanStyle 0.483344 Randomize (0.384, -0.888, 0.529) colorDistMagn 0.534739 colorDistFreq 0.00535631 detailScale 81.92 colorConversion true drivenDarkening -1 seaLevel -1 snowLevel 1 tropicLatitude 0.111391 icecapLatitude 1 icecapHeight 0 climatePole 0.9375 climateTropic 0.3125 climateEquator 0.6875 heightTempGrad 0.625 tropicWidth 0.07 mainFreq 0.667115 venusFreq 0 venusMagn 0 mareFreq -1.#IND mareDensity 0 terraceProb 0.42133 erosion 0 montesMagn 0.451666 montesFreq 3.32822 montesSpiky 0.935707 montesFraction 0.374968 dunesMagn 0 dunesFreq 0 dunesFraction 0 hillsMagn 0 hillsFreq 0.02634 hillsFraction 0.513837 hills2Fraction 0 riversMagn 0 riversFreq 0 riversSin 0 riversOctaves 0 canyonsMagn 0 canyonsFreq 0 canyonFraction 0 cracksMagn 0 cracksFreq 0 cracksOctaves 0 craterMagn 0.265351 craterFreq 0.230693 craterDensity 0.808872 craterOctaves 9 craterRayedFactor 0 volcanoMagn 0 volcanoFreq 0 volcanoDensity 0 volcanoOctaves 0 volcanoActivity 0 volcanoFlows 0 volcanoRadius 5 volcanoTemp 1737.08 lavaCoverTidal 0 lavaCoverSun 0 lavaCoverYoung 0 twistZones 0 twistMagn 0 cycloneMagn 0 cycloneFreq 0 cycloneDensity 0 cycloneOctaves 0 colorSea (0.553, 0.540, 0.535, 0.000) colorShelf (0.587, 0.574, 0.568, 0.000) colorBeach (0.622, 0.608, 0.602, 0.000) colorDesert (0.656, 0.642, 0.635, 0.000) colorLowland (0.691, 0.675, 0.668, 0.000) colorUpland (0.725, 0.709, 0.702, 0.000) colorRock (0.760, 0.743, 0.735, 0.000) colorSnow (0.794, 0.777, 0.769, 1.000) BumpHeight 0.89615 BumpOffset 0.54 SpecBrightWater 0 SpecBrightIce 0.03 SpecularPower 30 Hapke 1 SpotBright 4 SpotWidth 0.05 DayAmbient 0.07 }
NoClouds true
NoOcean true
NoLava true
NoAtmosphere true
NoAurora true
NoRings true
NoAccretionDisk true
NoCometTail true
You shouldn't include surface features in the .sc. SE generates that itself.
Quote Lucas0231 ( ) DwarfMoon "Celle I/S2003 (3782) 1"
It is not know as "Celle I". An "I" is only added to the end of a satellite that has been given a permanent designation, which this has not. Also its should be called "S2001 (3782) 1". The number after the S (Which stands for satellite) is the year it was discovered, not the year it was announced.
|
|
| |
Lucas0231 | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 18:46 | Message # 79 |
Explorer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| I use the option "export", is for a relief more "soft". The name "Celle I" is just for simplicity.
|
|
| |
Mosfet | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 19:06 | Message # 80 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 754
Status: Offline
| Quote Silicon ( ) should be called "S2001 (3782) 1". The number after the S (Which stands for satellite) is the year it was discovered, not the year it was announced. It should be noted though, that all Wikipedia articles are referring to the companion as 2003 (3782) 1. Still looking into this, but papers I've seen don't cite any name, conventions aside. I'd like a confirmation other than Wikipedia sources.
Lucas0231, I assume you used some data from french Wikipedia article and their sources, since Mean Anomaly and other orbital parameters are corresponding. Nonetheless radius and other parameters are not quite the same. Did you use SE Editor to input some data, perhaps?
Quote Lucas0231 ( ) I use the option "export", is for a relief more "soft". The name "Celle I" is just for simplicity. Ow, I'm too slow to post. I see, now I think I know why the RefPlane is "Extrasolar".
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Douglas N. Adams My mods Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram
Edited by Mosfet - Monday, 06.06.2016, 19:11 |
|
| |
Lucas0231 | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 19:19 | Message # 81 |
Explorer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| No, I use the JPL, but I use Wikipedia in French for few data (radius and semi major axis of the satellite).
|
|
| |
Mosfet | Date: Monday, 06.06.2016, 19:33 | Message # 82 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 754
Status: Offline
| Ok, thanks, I'll try to merge your data. There are a couple of mistakes, you used days for Period value instead of years, and "Extrasolar" must be changed in "Ecliptic". Also the semimajor axis of the companion is 30 km instead of 18 like in wikipedia, that's why I asked.
Edit: It turns out that nobody cared even for a provisional name, at least it seems by IAU circulars, because still investigating as "chip" member of Vesta family. Then we'll go by convention, and we'll use the year of discovery, ignoring Wikipedia (those articles are stub anyway) which probably based the name on the date of the announce. Unless someone else has more recent data.
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Douglas N. Adams My mods Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram
Edited by Mosfet - Monday, 06.06.2016, 20:08 |
|
| |
Silicon | Date: Tuesday, 07.06.2016, 23:19 | Message # 83 |
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 51
Status: Offline
| Quote Mosfet ( ) Then we'll go by convention, and we'll use the year of discovery I got this from just looking at the names of moons on Johnson's Archive which seem to be based on the date of discovery.
|
|
| |
Mosfet | Date: Wednesday, 08.06.2016, 10:44 | Message # 84 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 754
Status: Offline
| Yeah, me too, sources sometimes can be unclear or there could be exceptions anyway.
Asteroid Celle added, barycenter calculated from data provided.
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Douglas N. Adams My mods Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram
Edited by Mosfet - Wednesday, 08.06.2016, 10:49 |
|
| |
Lucas0231 | Date: Wednesday, 08.06.2016, 11:04 | Message # 85 |
Explorer
Group: Users
France
Messages: 150
Status: Offline
| Thank !
|
|
| |
Mosfet | Date: Monday, 13.06.2016, 22:00 | Message # 86 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 754
Status: Offline
| 1089 Tama, main belt binary:
Code Barycenter "Tama System" { ParentBody "Sol"
Orbit { Epoch 2457600.5 SemiMajorAxis 2.213775091 Period 3.293885112 MeanAnomaly 323.1902651 ArgOfPericenter 354.353642 Eccentricity 0.12750272 Inclination 3.7266981 AscendingNode 71.49098987 PericenterDist 1.931512745 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
Asteroid "Tama/(1089) Tama" { ParentBody "Tama System" Radius 5.35 AbsMagn 11.7 SlopeParam 0.15 Albedo 0.242 RotationPeriod 16.444 RotationOffset -100 Obliquity 5 // no data Surface { Randomize (-0.190, -0.117, -0.527) }
Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 3.36622635921822E-08 // 20.7 km Period 0.0018760155 // 0.6852 days MeanAnomaly 0 ArgOfPericenter 0 Eccentricity 0 Inclination 5 // no data AscendingNode 0 RefPlane "Equator" } }
Asteroid "S2003 (1089) 1" { ParentBody "Tama System" Radius 3.665 TidalLocked true Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 1.04708689838775E-07 // 20.7 km Period 0.0018760155 // 0.6852 days MeanAnomaly 0 ArgOfPericenter 180 Eccentricity 0 Inclination 5 // no data AscendingNode 0 RefPlane "Equator" } }
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Douglas N. Adams My mods Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram
|
|
| |
Silicon | Date: Thursday, 16.06.2016, 14:34 | Message # 87 |
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 51
Status: Offline
| 9069 Hovland and 15268 Wendelinefroger.
Code Asteroid "Hovland/(9069) Hovland" { ParentBody "Sol" Class "Asteroid" Radius 1.5
RotationPeriod 4.2175
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 1.9132 Period 2.6464 Eccentricity 0.1182 Inclination 19.572 AscendingNode 247.94 ArgOfPericenter 171.04 MeanAnomaly 200.24 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
Asteroid "S2004 (9069) 1" { ParentBody "Hovland" Class "Asteroid" Radius 0.45
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 5.21E-8 Period 0.003461 Eccentricity 0 Inclination 0 RefPlane "Equator" } }
Asteroid "Wendelinefroger/(15268) Wendelinefroger" { ParentBody "Sol" Class "Asteroid" Radius 1.915
RotationPeriod 2.4224
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 2.3651 Period 3.6374 Eccentricity 0.23509 Inclination 2.7541 AscendingNode 144.06 ArgOfPericenter 210.39 MeanAnomaly 205.83 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
Asteroid "S2008 (15268) 1" { ParentBody "Wendelinefroger" Class "Asteroid" Radius 0.515
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 5.82E-8 Period 0.002861 Eccentricity 0 Inclination 0 RefPlane "Equator" } }
|
|
| |
SpaceEngineer | Date: Saturday, 18.06.2016, 11:10 | Message # 88 |
Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
| 2004 BP108 system have wrong rotational axes. Fix:
Code Asteroid "2004 PB108" { ParentBody "2004 PB108 System" Class "Asteroid" Radius 121.5 //Volume 7.51E6 = 87% Mass 1.586E-6 AsterType "Cubewano" AbsMagn 6.6 SlopeParam 0.15 Albedo 0.08 Obliquity 106.55
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 9.0376E-6 // 10400 km Period 0.265632 Eccentricity 0.438 Inclination 106.55 ArgOfPericenter 180 MeanAnomaly 0 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
Asteroid "S2006 (2004 PB108) 1" { ParentBody "2004 PB108 System" Class "Asteroid" Radius 64.5 //Volume 1.12E6 = 13% Obliquity 106.55
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 6.048E-5 // 10400 km Period 0.265632 Eccentricity 0.438 Inclination 106.55 ArgOfPericenter 0 MeanAnomaly 0 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
Please copy these parameters from old astroids/Kuiper belt catalogs:
Code AsterType "Cubewano" AbsMagn 6.6 SlopeParam 0.15
AbsMagn and SlopeParam are used to calculate apparent stellar magnitude of asteroid, AsterType will be used in future.
|
|
| |
Mosfet | Date: Saturday, 18.06.2016, 16:56 | Message # 89 |
World Builder
Group: Users
Italy
Messages: 754
Status: Offline
| Done, thanks, updated in OP.
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Douglas N. Adams My mods Asus x555ub: cpu i5-6200u - ram 4gb - gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram
|
|
| |
Silicon | Date: Sunday, 19.06.2016, 20:38 | Message # 90 |
Astronaut
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 51
Status: Offline
| Made a catalog correction to 317 Roxane, Primary had the wrong radius.
Code Asteroid "Roxane/(317) Roxane" { ParentBody "Sol" Class "Asteroid" Radius 9.93 RotationPeriod 8.169
Orbit { Epoch 2457400.5 SemiMajorAxis 2.2867 Period 3.4581 Eccentricity 0.085548 Inclination 1.7653 AscendingNode 151.38 ArgOfPericenter 187.09 MeanAnomaly 171.1 RefPlane "Ecliptic" } }
DwarfMoon "S2009 (317) 1" { ParentBody "Roxane" Class "Asteroid" Radius 2.65
Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 1.718E-6 // 257 km Period 0.038331 Eccentricity 0 Inclination 0 RefPlane "Equator" } }
|
|
| |