Quote FastFourierTransform (
)
Well. Not so fast! lets examine arbelrocks contribution:
The Cassini Camera took that first image. In the specifications of the instrument it says that the range of the color filters it uses spans from 200 nm to 1100 nm. So this image is probably coding not only visible light but also a bit of UV and a huge part of the Near-Infrared band. The Image probably shows some cloud contours because the team has taken the results from the near infrared and has assigned to them a visible color (pushing the visible colors more tightly in the process I assume). For that reason, this is not exactly how Saturn would look like if you where there. Probably SpaceEngine is "more realistic" in that sense that reality itself because cloud structures on Saturn are not so easily visible.
How did you display the images? I tried using [img] but it didn't work
ENG
New site
United States 
The golden hues, variations across the cloud bands, and the blueness of the winter hemisphere are all quite apparent in visible light. This is an image I took through my university scope a few years ago:
Russian Federation 
Spain 
I think 99% of the time that conclusion would be the correct one -- normally a multi-wavelength image shows or enhances details that are not normally visible to the eye. And that's probably still true to some degree in this case, but the real appearance is still closer to that than the SE look. 
Pirate 
